Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shula Has To Go Soon


CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

Sure, it's not entirely Mike's fault. I mean it's not like Gettleman has gave him much to work with. But on the other hand I know someone with a better football mind can use the strengths of Cam and co. much better. This has just been ugly; who runs the ball on fuging 3rd and 8? Much less with what we have at OL and RB. So question is, with Chudzinski now listed as a Special Assistant for Indy, do you think there's any chance we could bring him back? He knows most of the players on this offense and could do a much better job with them IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring back Chud. Why do people here hate him so much?' Sure he went full stupid some games, but he finally reeled it in and we finished the season strong. Ive said this a million times, we do not have the defense NOR the running game NOR the oline to run a Shula offense. Literally every single one of our RBs are out, thats Chuds wet dream come true right there seeing as how he hates utilizing RBs anyway.

Bring back 2011 Chud and the two TE sets and live and die by the high octane passing offense. Our D is playing like ass now anyway. Might as well try to win shoot outs.

Cam is a waaay better QB and better passer now than he was a couple years ago. Him, Cam and KB would do wonders together. With Dwil, Tolbert and Stewie out anyway, that takes the pressure off Chud to feel forced to have to use RBs, now he could truely do what he wants to do. Chud knows Cam, knows this personnel, knows Ron and would be a seamless transition. Mark my words, Rivera is giving serious thought to bringing Chud back, he just wont say it publicly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring back Chud. Why do people here hate him so much?' Sure he went full stupid some games, but he finally reeled it in and we finished the season strong. Ive said this a million times, we do not have the defense NOR the running game NOR the oline to run a Shula offense. Literally every single one of our RBs are out, thats Chuds wet dream come true right there seeing as how he hates utilizing RBs anyway.

Bring back 2011 Chud and the two TE sets and live and die by the high octane passing offense. Our D is playing like ass now anyway. Might as well try to win shoot outs.

Cam is a waaay better QB and better passer now than he was a couple years ago. Him, Cam and KB would do wonders together. With Dwil, Tolbert and Stewie out anyway, that takes the pressure off Chud to feel forced to have to use RBs, now he could truely do what he wants to do. Chud knows Cam, knows this personnel, knows Ron and would be a seamless transition. Mark my words, Rivera is giving serious thought to bringing Chud back, he just wont say it publicly

As much as we crap on Shula, we have a ton of evidence Chud was a problem. DWill and Smitty took multiple shots at him after he left. RR commented that the hardest part about being a new HC was building a cohesive coaching staff (hint the only significant change was Chud). Reportedly he ran through plays only once during practice and didn't bother to check if players were comfortable with it.

There's a reason he was fired mid-season in Cleveland. Chud is just too much of a headache to justify his "genius".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't argue with results. This Carolina passing offense was top 10 both seasons he was here, had a top 10 passing offense with Cleveland (who I think is stupid for letting him go so quick), etc. And please don't pull the record card. We were trending up with Chud and he seemed to be getting better in his 2nd year. Cam has matured as a person and passer, we now have Kelvin, and we have 3 tight ends who aren't being used right. Shula out, Chud in! I'm all for it. You know Chud loves those two tight end sets. Besides, you already know our running game isn't going to do anything this year. Might as well go with an all out air attack this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't argue with results. This Carolina offense was top 10 both seasons he was here, had a top 10 offense with Cleveland (who I think is stupid for letting him go so quick), etc. And please don't pull the record card. We were trending up with Chud and he seemed to be getting better in his 2nd year. Cam has matured as a person and passer, we now have Kelvin, and we have 3 tight ends who aren't being used right. Shula out, Chud in! I'm all for it. You know Chud loves those two tight end sets.

 

This isn't true at all. We were 5th in 2011, but went to 18th in 2012. Browns were ranked 27th last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...