Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers take Chris Ogbonnaya off the street and put him on the roster


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

After his first game he has as many touchdown runs as DeAngelo, Stewart, and Tolbert combined this year.

 

Somebody needs to call in 730 this week and bring that to Hurney's attention

 

Somebody needs to call in to Marc James down in Atlanta just for shlts and giggles.

 

these-are-the-best-combined-gifs-ever-15

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no guys we should hear him out I mean why pay like $500,000 for a mediocre running game when you can pay $15,000,000 for a pathetic running game?

 

Hell Hurney could have at least screwed up properly.....draft Forte in the 2nd(he went 1 pick after our original 2nd) and not trade away the first.

 

poo imagine if he had drafted Brandon Albert 1(2 picks after Stew) and Forte 2......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No no guys we should hear him out I mean why pay like $500,000 for a mediocre running game when you can pay $15,000,000 for a pathetic running game?

 

Thanks for hearing.

 

I of course hope we could save that much money and use it somewhere necessary, but I hope we could watch more games of our new guys before giving up on our 1st team running back group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the post, in my opinion our OL plays better this game on running blocking and I hope they can keep doing so.

 

60ish yards rushing and 3ypc.....they suck and that certainly isn't any better than week 1 for example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...