Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marvel movie announcement.


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

God damn amateur thread starters

 

 

2015:

May 1: The Avengers: Age of Ultron

July 17: Ant-Man

2016:

May 6: Captain America 3

November 4: Doctor Strange

2017:

May 5: Guardians of the Galaxy 2

July 28: Thor: Ragnarok

November 3: Black Panther

2018:

May 4: The Avengers: Infinity War, Part One

July 6: Captain Marvel

November 2: Inhumans

2019:

May 3: The Avengers: Infinity War, Part Two

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this basically confirms we'll Black Panther end credits or w/e on Avengers 2 I'm guessing?

 

Really stoked for this.  Although surprised they didn't do a Ms. Marvel instead of Cap Marvel, or will she be her Cap Marvel version in that movie?  Not sure.

 

Kind of disappointed there is no Planet Hulk in there though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...