Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JA Adande proves his stupidity on ATH


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

They were debating the chances of the Panthers to get the #1 seed and JA Adande said he wasn't mentally prepared to say the Panthers would get the #1 seed and said, "Isn't this the team that started the season 1-2?"

Um, no idiot, we started 2-0. Jeez, all you have to do is check ESPN.com to see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were debating the chances of the Panthers to get the #1 seed and JA Adande said he wasn't mentally prepared to say the Panthers would get the #1 seed and said, "Isn't this the team that started the season 1-2?"

Um, no idiot, we started 2-0. Jeez, all you have to do is check ESPN.com to see that.

you beat me to it..lol. wow where the fug do they find these guys. i mean if you don't wanna talk about us thats fine, but please get facts right first damn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was wrong. He doesn't know about our team. He doesn't like us. Oh well, who cares?

What did you expect to get out of this thread besides a bunch of losers throwing a tantrum about getting dissed by a talking head on television? Is it too much to ask that we shrug these things off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were debating the chances of the Panthers to get the #1 seed and JA Adande said he wasn't mentally prepared to say the Panthers would get the #1 seed and said, "Isn't this the team that started the season 1-2?"

Um, no idiot, we started 2-0. Jeez, all you have to do is check ESPN.com to see that.

What a dumb-a$$...If I'm not mistaken he writes 4 the LA times...If anything, that just tells you how far off the national radar we are...which is perfect in my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if some people would stop drooling over big market teams that are overrated and actually pay attention to teams like us, ESPN wouldnt have this problem and these idiots would be gone off shows like that...

I just know that if the Patriots, Giants, hell Falcons had Dwill and Jstew, not only would they know we DIDNT start 1-2, but they would be saying something along the lines of "best RB tandem ever?" or some crazy stuff like that..

ESPN has gone WAY downhill in my mind and its because of idiots like JA and others and the uncontrollable bias they have towards big market teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do love Woody saying he seen the best team in the NFL play last night. Impressed by a big win w/ no real factor by Pep.

But yea, J.A. usually knows his sh*t, but I guess not about us!

That was a dumb comment too, Peppers played a big role in the pressure. Not our fault chokeholds apparently don't constitute holding anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if some people would stop drooling over big market teams that are overrated and actually pay attention to teams like us, ESPN wouldnt have this problem and these idiots would be gone off shows like that...

I just know that if the Patriots, Giants, hell Falcons had Dwill and Jstew, not only would they know we DIDNT start 1-2, but they would be saying something along the lines of "best RB tandem ever?" or some crazy stuff like that..

ESPN has gone WAY downhill in my mind and its because of idiots like JA and others and the uncontrollable bias they have towards big market teams.

Falcons? We were absolutely vilified and are far from a big market team (although moreso than Charlotte) however ESPN was hugging Carolinas nuts for a couple years after the SB loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...