Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A rare good point from the guys at WFNZ


QCkilla

Recommended Posts

So Clinton Portis and Muhsin Muhammad were just talking about the good scouting departments around the NFL and many of them have one thing in common: former players. As far as I know, the Panthers don't have any former players in their scouting department. In fact, a former Panther (Dan Morgan) is a member of possibly the best scouting department in the NFL at the moment (Seahawks). Ricky Proehl begged for Keenan Allen and Kelvin Benjamin. He got his wish with the latter, but imagine if we had both of them. It only makes sense that former players would be good at evaluating the necessary traits that make up a good NFL player but we don't use any. Our draft history since 2007 when Don Gregory took over is pretty damn terrible, so why not utilize former players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Clinton Portis and Muhsin Muhammad were just talking about the good scouting departments around the NFL and many of them have one thing in common: former players. As far as I know, the Panthers don't have any former players in their scouting department. In fact, a former Panther (Dan Morgan) is a member of possibly the best scouting department in the NFL at the moment (Seahawks). Ricky Proehl begged for Keenan Allen and Kelvin Benjamin. He got his wish with the latter, but imagine if we had both of them. It only makes sense that former players would be good at evaluating the necessary traits that make up a good NFL player but we don't use any. Our draft history since 2007 when Don Gregory took over is pretty damn terrible, so why not utilize former players?

 

We could have had Keenan and Kel...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We draft pretty well overall. We are better than most teams with our top picks. In fact if you look at our first round picks over the last decade we probably do better than anyone (and those first rounders have a good rate)

What I think we do poorly in isn't drafting. It is FA and acquired talent. Last year was the first time we hit on guys in a long time and they all immediately left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We draft pretty well overall. We are better than most teams with our top picks. In fact if you look at our first round picks over the last decade we probably do better than anyone (and those first rounders have a good rate)

What I think we do poorly in isn't drafting. It is FA and acquired talent. Last year was the first time we hit on guys in a long time and they all immediately left.

 

Our first rounders have been great, but the later rounds have been absolute dog poo. Other than Cam, we have no one left from 2011, for example. But still, I agree with you that our FA scouting sucks too. In fact, that's Dan Morgan's job in Seattle. He's in the pro personnel scouting department. I just think former players as scouts makes sense so that's probably the answer to my question of why it's not happening here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering our 1st round selections have either been rookie of the year or up for it i think were doing pretty good. Later rounds however are a different story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering our 1st round selections have either been rookie of the year or up for it i think were doing pretty good. Later rounds however are a different story

 

I agree, and if we had to pick one round to be good in, I'm glad we picked the first round. But that's the problem, we're only good in one round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our first rounders have been great, but the later rounds have been absolute dog poo. Other than Cam, we have no one left from 2011, for example. But still, I agree with you that our FA scouting sucks too. In fact, that's Dan Morgan's job in Seattle. He's in the pro personnel scouting department. I just think former players as scouts makes sense so that's probably the answer to my question of why it's not happening here.

Pick 4 random teams out of a hat.

Compare draft jobs. We should come out looking good.

Then compare FA acquisitions and guys brought in via trade....

I just think our biggest weakness is all we do is draft well. We don't fill our holes well in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

free agency has been the problem.

 

if there is a problem in the draft, it's been in drafting offensive players. we don't do it very often and we don't do it well, aside from cam and kelvin.

 

former players might be able to help, but i don't think it would be a sure fire fix. being a former player doesn't necessarily mean they will be better scouts than non-former players. it could give them a leg up, but i don't think the fact that we don't have former players is indicitive of anything nor is it, in itself, a problem or a weakness. it could help, but i think what would help most is having cap space and not being afraid to admit that it's quite possible that the answer isn't already on the roster and a willingness to go out and grab some free agents who can help or at least provide competition and depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I'd like to add a monster TE as much as anyone else but ultimately what use will that serve with a QB who had 54 passing yards in 4 quarters at one point last season? Defense defense defense.
    • Personally I think he's a nightmare to cover I think linebackers generally aren't fast enough to keep up with him in coverage and cornerbacks don't have the strength to tackle him one-on-one in physically bring them down which would normally lead to a broken tackle or a nasty stiff arm or just bully ball play sure you could find a receiver with comparable speed like Cooper but he's faster than Cooper sure you can find a wide receiver that is the same size but he's probably More powerful than them and a better blocker.  The size speed athleticism package that he is in is completely unique it's easier to say I'd rather have just a big blocker because we've never seen this type of profile before I'm a risk taker I think you would be God blessed if this was there at 19 I think if you can get a guy that's a tight end who immediately becomes the fastest guy on your offense and at the same time that third wide receiver that can stretch and burn defenses over the top that's the perfect what the Panthers need type weapon.
    • I think you're under selling Sadiq. They are two different players in terms of how they win. Loveland is 2 inches taller maybe 5-6 pounds heavier. Comparing his speed to sadiq.. well your comparing a 4.7 guy to a 4.3 guy I'm seeing a guy that can take a bubble screen from the tight end position and turn it into a house call. I'm not saying the guy is a certified home run pick but I don't think there's really a president's for a comparison for this kind of athlete. It's easy to say this doesn't look like Warren or Loveland because we haven't seen guys that fit this profile The closest you might be able to get is Vernon Davis.  He's not as sure far as those guys were but at 19 I think almost everybody is going to have some warts and he's a lottery ticket of could be top 10 in the draft player or could fail I am more of a risk taker I think he fits the athletic profile that could be a homerun, like I said he's almost 40 lb bigger than Cooper and like 4-5 in taller than Cooper so and he's faster. So whatever you think Cooper gives you I think he does that and more. If you want to go with one of the office alignment I can understand that as well but for value as a receiving threat I don't think there's a bigger value at number 19.
×
×
  • Create New...