Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Bait


stirs

Recommended Posts

If we were to fire Fox a team would hire him in minutes.

People don't seem to realize how respected he is as a coach around the League.

Fine and dandy....let him be respected somewhere else then. :D

All I know is, if he still insist on allowing a QB who has turned the ball over six times in the game, and allowing the ball to be thrown on your own 15, with 10 seconds left and the game tied, knowing your QB's are getting killed, he's not gonna be respected anywhere, anytime soon.

He is a double edge sword, just like Jake. You can't help but like them, but by God Almighty do they make you so dang mad sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ONe more name to throw into the DT discussion is Alan Branch of the Cards. He came out in '07 and dropped to the second round due to question of work ethic. In listening to a Arizona camp report is was mentioned that he was not adjusting well to the change to the 3-4 (like Dorsey). Unlike Dorsey, he is much closer to Kemo's size (6'5" 338) and according to rotoworld has a 2009 cap figure of $1.2 million. With the likely comp picks of a 3&5 or even two 3's for Hamb/Ormi we could afford to use a 3rd or 4th plus a player. He may be the closest to a Kemo clone out there who is available, cap reasonable and experienced enough to step right in.

Agreed

I mentioned in another post that they had Branch and Gabe Watson, both who could fill the bill. But, they are moving to the 3-4 themselves I think, so they might not give one of them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this team can't find one or two worthwhile guys after cuts, they will trade for someone serviceable even if it comes with a hefty price tag. Guarantee it. This team saw that it had an opportunity window of probably three years, beginning last year, with a solid group that they we comfortable with and wanted to retain. IMO they have shown that they are willing to mortgage this team to try to add the pieces they WANT and find success in the next two years. Why would they not continue to mortgage the future to add the pieces they NEED?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine and dandy....let him be respected somewhere else then. :D

All I know is, if he still insist on allowing a QB who has turned the ball over six times in the game, and allowing the ball to be thrown on your own 15, with 10 seconds left and the game tied, knowing your QB's are getting killed, he's not gonna be respected anywhere, anytime soon.

He is a double edge sword, just like Jake. You can't help but like them, but by God Almighty do they make you so dang mad sometime.

I know you're not talking about a preseason game. Who the hell wants to watch an extra quarter of 3rd stringers? I'm glad he did it. You honestly think he would have done it in the regular season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...