Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy, Kalil, DeAngelo, Stewart, Bell, Charles Johnson: Who will be back next year?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Staying: Kalil, Stewart, Bell, and yes.....Hardy (if not guilty).

CJ- gone for $ reasons, replaced in FA.

D-Will- gone and will be replaced in the draft.

***This list depends on Hardy's trial. Hardy gets a guilty verdict, we will pay CJ and send Hardy on his way.***

 

I think the only way hardy is back is if he is found not guilty and the market is not as strong for him as he thinks it should be, so he signs a one year prove-it deal to re-build his value.  And even then, it's no certainty.  I get the feeling JR may want to simply wash his hands of the stain Hardy left on the team this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalils base salary is $5M. That is the only part we can push forward by reconstructing. The prorated $6.5M will hit regardless.

June first is no free lunch, you just spread the problem over two years. To push dead money into 2016 will just make the rebuilding take longer.

Question is really, should we go into full rebuild and cut all five and tank 2015? Because there is no way we will be competitive with that kind of dead money.

 

I don't think we will use the June 1st designation on any of the big contracts.  Like you said, it just pushes a huge cap charge to next year.  What I do expect to happen, though, is that they will use it on a smaller contract that they can more easily absorb next year.  My guess is that DeAngelo will be the victim.  He's clearly not the same back he used to be, so I think they will try to upgrade the position while saving 2 million. 

 

I also think CJ will be here next year, regardless of what happens with Hardy.  And unless he re-does his deal, he will likely be gone after that.  That's when his cap hit becomes manageable and we can create significant savings by letting him go.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't an expansion team, it's a team one year removed from a playoff birth that has a few very specific, fixable flaws.

And yes, if I had an expansion team I would shell out on a top-three center. Having a good line does a lot for your young quarterback.

And if shelling out big money to your C means bad T or G play? Like any position group there is only so much you can invest into it....have an entire roster to fill out.

If I am starting from scratch. My money is going to the T spots. Especially my QB blind side. I also build at least one side I can run behind consistantly...

Average C play would do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...