Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It is great how


Bozarden

Recommended Posts

Seattle has completely disowned the saying that you need a great QB to win. They have a great team, who kept together all game, despite of their offense falling apart repeatedly and in the end they capitalized on Green Bay who refused to put the game away. Wilson made some good plays to win the game in the end, but played an absolutely terrible game all in all, so please stop talking about how he should be in the hall of fame, when reality the entire Seattle team should go down in history as one of the most well put together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Seattle make a deal with God or something? Luckiest team ever. I kid you not, RIGHT before they kicked that onside kick, I said to my homies they were going to get it. I said they were going to win the coin toss in OT too. Wilson can just throw up ANYTHING and somehow the receivers comes down with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, that 2 pt conversion wasn't luck.

 

Pure skill. If you can't see that then you are a homer.

 

Wilson knew exactly what he was doing when he looked the other way,  closed his eyes and tossed the ball 100 yards straight up in the air.  He knew that 5 Packer defenders would miss it,  as it floated between all of them..  and he knew that his guy would bring it down.     Just pure skiill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...