Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilson & Luck


Dexterity

Recommended Posts

Maybe he could try to avoid throwing 4 interceptions. The fact that Seattle still won speak volumes as to how little Wilsons' performance has to do with Seattle winning. He is the quarterback in the league who has to do the least in order to win and it is really not close.

Wouldn't you want a team like that where it's not on one guys shoulders? What's he supposed to go tell the GM to trade guys away? Lol

I'd say his performance down the stretch when it was money time helped. It's not autopilot just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. You really know nothing about football. The perfomance of his TEAM won the game. Wilson quite frankly sucked

You're the one who knows nothing about football. I'm still laughing at your ridiculous post. 

 

Feel free to make another lol post, I've got better things to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck clearly struggled but so did the team around him, that was just a collapse, and they simply got outplayed.

I wouldn't write off Luck just because of this loss. Rodgers didn't exactly play his best game yesterday either.

exactly. Which is my point about fantasy football. We want the stats more than the outcome and then we lose big picture perspective.

Im gonna go out on a limb and venture to guess all losers in champ games or super bowls didn't play great overall. The winner played better. Or at least when it matters most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson: 48% Cmp, 209 Yd, 1 Td, 4 Int

Luck: 35% Cmp, 126 Yd, 2 Int

Bonus

Playoffs @ Seattle

Rodgers: 56% Cmp, 178 Yd, 1 Td, 2 Int

Newton: 64% Cmp, 246 Yd, 2 Td, 2 Int

 

What does this prove exactly? It's just like Squirrel who said Geno has had one game in the NFL with a perfect rating and Cam has never had that thus Geno may be better than Cam. One game proves nothing!

 

There is a reason both Cam's coach and GM used a certain buzz word at their end of season presser; CONSISTENCY. After Cam's game against the Bengals, he was inconsistent until the end of our season. If any of those players you have named were consistently playing with those stats, they would not be who they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does this prove exactly? It's just like Squirrel who said Geno has had one game in the NFL with a perfect rating and Cam has never had that thus Geno may be better than Cam. One game proves nothing!

There is a reason both Cam's coach and GM used a certain buzz word at their end of season presser; CONSISTENCY. After Cam's game against the Bengals, he was inconsistent until the end of our season. If any of those players you have named were consistently playing with those stats, they would not be who they were.

Luck had the 2nd highest number of turnovers this year of any player in the National Football League. So he CONSISTENTLY turns it over more than any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck had the 2nd highest number of turnovers this year of any player in the National Football League. So he CONSISTENTLY turns it over more than any.

 

Actually he was 6th in INT, behind Brees who was 5th and one more than Peyton who was 7th. The reason no one is bitching is that he had the highest number of TDs for this season, ahead of all the NFL veterans and was 3rd in yds. This is a third year QB playing up there with the elite, no one is going to harp on those INT (which I am sure he will work on).

 

For every 2.5 TDs that he threw, he threw one INT. For every 1.5 TDs that Cam threw, he threw an INT. Use that for perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilt Chamberlain > Michael Jordan.  What were we talking about again?  Oh...

 

Give Cam the Seattle defense, coaching staff, and their dome and watch him perform every bit as well as Wilson, if not better.  But anyone who thinks Wilson is just a game manager isn't really paying much attention.  His decision making is generally outstanding, and he's a great running threat.

 

Put Cam on the Colts and he will automatically get an additional 3-4 wins per year just from playing Tennessee, Jacksonville, and Houston twice.  In the meantime, Luck will suddenly draw constant comparisons to Brees and Ryan and would still be talked about in terms of his potential rather than as the second coming of Manning.  He's still a great young QB though, and will be a lot of fun to watch for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question you have to ask yourself is very simple. If you were the GM of an expansion team and could select between Luck, Newton and Wilson.

Who would you select to start your roster with?

 

Well..  what about if you were the GM...and all you had control of was Cam......not the power of GMs from other teams?

 

Would you want him....or one of the Qbs that will be free agents this offseason,  or Qbs from the draft within our draft range?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually he was 6th in INT, behind Brees who was 5th and one more than Peyton who was 7th. The reason no one is bitching is that he had the highest number of TDs for this season, ahead of all the NFL veterans and was 3rd in yds. This is a third year QB playing up there with the elite, no one is going to harp on those INT (which I am sure he will work on).

For every 2.5 TDs that he threw, he threw one INT. For every 1.5 TDs that Cam threw, he threw an INT. Use that for perspective.

I said turnovers. Did you forget fumbles, where he led the league with both 13 and 6 lost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like many of the old heads, I’ve been here for a long time.  I got a lot of respect for everyone on this board for your dedication to this team.  We’ve all been through it during the tougher years. At this point in life, I’m not one to judge anyone’s level of dedication, or their reasons why anymore.  Time, and a lot of bad football, will do that.  For me, it’s simple.  We share a common bond.  For that, I love and appreciate all of you crazy SOB’s. For me, last season was at a minimum, entertaining.  BY lead a young team to multiple come from behind 4th qtr wins.  That showed me heart, and that he has the clutch gene.  That’s the wildcard intangible.  For me, that was fun to watch even  if it was mindbogglingly frustrating at times.  Over the past two seasons, we have progressively built a better team around him.  On paper, the defense should be better this season.  That’ll help.  Let’s see what he can do as the other guys continue to develop too.  Besides, his contract is cheap for a few more years, and we just made some smart cap decisions during the draft. Let’s see how it shakes out. 
    • Hiring Shula & his Cam save us playbook.
    • I would very much liked to have seen Jake Delhomme's career if Tommy Jone no hurt Jake.  I just know that roster and the leadership were destined to hit paydirt but Jake was never the same after the elbow injury, and unfortunately he was the sole reason they didn't make it back to the big one.  I think that 08 team was the best in the league, and Jake masked his inability well all season til the Arizona game put it all on display.  I'll go back to the season prior even and say the 07 team was primed to be a competitor.  Jake was off to a fantastic start that year (for a Panthers QB).  They may have been a championship caliber club for a few seasons after 08 too.
×
×
  • Create New...