Wilson & Luck

[pstall]

Maybe he could try to avoid throwing 4 interceptions. The fact that Seattle still won speak volumes as to how little Wilsons' performance has to do with Seattle winning. He is the quarterback in the league who has to do the least in order to win and it is really not close.

Wouldn't you want a team like that where it's not on one guys shoulders? What's he supposed to go tell the GM to trade guys away? Lol

I'd say his performance down the stretch when it was money time helped. It's not autopilot just yet.

[caatfan]

Lol. You really know nothing about football. The perfomance of his TEAM won the game. Wilson quite frankly sucked

You're the one who knows nothing about football. I'm still laughing at your ridiculous post. 

 

Feel free to make another lol post, I've got better things to do. 

[Pox 08]

Wilson beat Rodgers!   Wilson destroyed Rodgers!   When Wilson beats Brady in the SB, he will be the bestest ever.

[pstall]

I think we are seeing the unintended consequences of fantasy football and how it distorts our ability to watch the games and properly evaluate players and teams. Football is the ultimate team sport.

[TheRed]

Luck clearly struggled but so did the team around him, that was just a collapse, and they simply got outplayed.

I wouldn't write off Luck just because of this loss. Rodgers didn't exactly play his best game yesterday either.

[pstall]

Luck clearly struggled but so did the team around him, that was just a collapse, and they simply got outplayed.

I wouldn't write off Luck just because of this loss. Rodgers didn't exactly play his best game yesterday either.

exactly. Which is my point about fantasy football. We want the stats more than the outcome and then we lose big picture perspective.

Im gonna go out on a limb and venture to guess all losers in champ games or super bowls didn't play great overall. The winner played better. Or at least when it matters most.

[CelibatePimp]

Wilson: 48% Cmp, 209 Yd, 1 Td, 4 Int

Luck: 35% Cmp, 126 Yd, 2 Int

Bonus

Playoffs @ Seattle

Rodgers: 56% Cmp, 178 Yd, 1 Td, 2 Int

Newton: 64% Cmp, 246 Yd, 2 Td, 2 Int

 

What does this prove exactly? It's just like Squirrel who said Geno has had one game in the NFL with a perfect rating and Cam has never had that thus Geno may be better than Cam. One game proves nothing!

 

There is a reason both Cam's coach and GM used a certain buzz word at their end of season presser; CONSISTENCY. After Cam's game against the Bengals, he was inconsistent until the end of our season. If any of those players you have named were consistently playing with those stats, they would not be who they were.

[RoaringRiot]

Lol. You really know nothing about football. The perfomance of his TEAM won the game. Wilson quite frankly sucked

What?

[ctrcat]

What does this prove exactly? It's just like Squirrel who said Geno has had one game in the NFL with a perfect rating and Cam has never had that thus Geno may be better than Cam. One game proves nothing!

There is a reason both Cam's coach and GM used a certain buzz word at their end of season presser; CONSISTENCY. After Cam's game against the Bengals, he was inconsistent until the end of our season. If any of those players you have named were consistently playing with those stats, they would not be who they were.

Luck had the 2nd highest number of turnovers this year of any player in the National Football League. So he CONSISTENTLY turns it over more than any.

[Kevin Greene]

The question you have to ask yourself is very simple. If you were the GM of an expansion team and could select between Luck, Newton and Wilson.

Who would you select to start your roster with?

[CelibatePimp]

Luck had the 2nd highest number of turnovers this year of any player in the National Football League. So he CONSISTENTLY turns it over more than any.

 

Actually he was 6th in INT, behind Brees who was 5th and one more than Peyton who was 7th. The reason no one is bitching is that he had the highest number of TDs for this season, ahead of all the NFL veterans and was 3rd in yds. This is a third year QB playing up there with the elite, no one is going to harp on those INT (which I am sure he will work on).

 

For every 2.5 TDs that he threw, he threw one INT. For every 1.5 TDs that Cam threw, he threw an INT. Use that for perspective.

[Cyberjag]

Wilt Chamberlain > Michael Jordan.  What were we talking about again?  Oh...

 

Give Cam the Seattle defense, coaching staff, and their dome and watch him perform every bit as well as Wilson, if not better.  But anyone who thinks Wilson is just a game manager isn't really paying much attention.  His decision making is generally outstanding, and he's a great running threat.

 

Put Cam on the Colts and he will automatically get an additional 3-4 wins per year just from playing Tennessee, Jacksonville, and Houston twice.  In the meantime, Luck will suddenly draw constant comparisons to Brees and Ryan and would still be talked about in terms of his potential rather than as the second coming of Manning.  He's still a great young QB though, and will be a lot of fun to watch for years to come.

[Pox 08]

The question you have to ask yourself is very simple. If you were the GM of an expansion team and could select between Luck, Newton and Wilson.

Who would you select to start your roster with?

 

Well..  what about if you were the GM...and all you had control of was Cam......not the power of GMs from other teams?

 

Would you want him....or one of the Qbs that will be free agents this offseason,  or Qbs from the draft within our draft range?

[ctrcat]

Actually he was 6th in INT, behind Brees who was 5th and one more than Peyton who was 7th. The reason no one is bitching is that he had the highest number of TDs for this season, ahead of all the NFL veterans and was 3rd in yds. This is a third year QB playing up there with the elite, no one is going to harp on those INT (which I am sure he will work on).

For every 2.5 TDs that he threw, he threw one INT. For every 1.5 TDs that Cam threw, he threw an INT. Use that for perspective.

I said turnovers. Did you forget fumbles, where he led the league with both 13 and 6 lost?