Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte in discussions for acquiring Mo Williams

YoungPanthers89

By YoungPanthers89,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

CarolinaNCSU Proficient

CarolinaNCSU

Posted
Posted

Not a fan of giving up any future assets if the Hornets do actually go the trade route. Unless it's landing us a stud and shipping out some contracts or Lance. 

 

 

The East sucks this year as usual, but the Hornets aren't getting out of the first round this year, if they even make the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

I would be slightly excited about the move, but honestly, I would probably feel that about any move lol. That being said, the thing with this is, Roberts has played really well in Kemba's absence to the point that I don't feel like PG is the position that we need to be looking at an upgrade for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

I would be slightly excited about the move, but honestly, I would probably feel that about any move lol. That being said, the thing with this is, Roberts has played really well in Kemba's absence to the point that I don't feel like PG is the position that we need to be looking at an upgrade for.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Lance and Neal run the second unit.

 

Good point, but as I said in one of the game threads...  I don't even care as far as Lance goes anymore.  I get the feeling that teams were lowballing us, so I say bump it...  We'll keep him and hope for the best.

 

That being said, anything to get Neal off the floor will do our team wonders, and Mo is a good scorer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

Good point, but as I said in one of the game threads...  I don't even care as far as Lance goes anymore.  I get the feeling that teams were lowballing us, so I say bump it...  We'll keep him and hope for the best.

 

That being said, anything to get Neal off the floor will do our team wonders, and Mo is a good scorer.

 

 

February 19th can't get here fast enough. At this point I dump Lance and Neal for whoever will take a chance on them for minimal return. Addition by subtraction. Look at the Pistons and Josh Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • CanadianCat
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
    • mrcompletely11
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      That doesn't void his contract 
×
×
  • Create New...