Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton: Panthers will NOT add Gurley or Gordon (unless they fall to the second)!


top dawg

Recommended Posts

BPA is coach speak. Who is BPA for team A, team B, team C are all likely different. So BPA isn't BPA. It is team specific largely.

Cam was BPA for us in 2011.....bc of Carolina factors. Wasn't probably for most teams at 1....not even top 32 for some. Yes there are some examples of a glaring BPA....but overall BPA actually factors in many things.

 

BPA isn't just coach speak. There is a clear difference between the drafting for need and drafting BPA philosophies. And of course BPA is different for every team, it's OPINION. There's no set ranking of players that is regarded as universal fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched virtually nothing of Gordon but Gurley is incredible. If he's there on board in the 2nd, then even I in all my disdain for high round RBs would be hard pressed to pass him up.

That said, it's only an outside shot he's there and this draft is deep with talented players at the position. You're going to see a plethora of NFL starters come off the board in the later rounds (rather than Kenjon Barners), and I figure we probably get one there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPA is coach speak. Who is BPA for team A, team B, team C are all likely different. So BPA isn't BPA. It is team specific largely.

Cam was BPA for us in 2011.....bc of Carolina factors. Wasn't probably for most teams at 1....not even top 32 for some. Yes there are some examples of a glaring BPA....but overall BPA actually factors in many things.

Normally I'd agree, that it's coach speak, but listening to Gettleman's combine presser makes me doubt those thoughts.  At one point, he explained, "we're gonna draft the best guy, and if we have 5 stud guys at that position, and we're sitting there, and that position has the best guy, I'm taking him.  You can look at me like I got brain damage, but.... I'm gonna do it.  I'm just being honest guys."

 

That's BPA in the most literal sense I can imagine.  Maybe he's blowing smoke up people's asses, idk, but that's from the horse's mouth.

 

He says that at about the 3:45 mark.

http://www.panthers.com/media-vault/videos/Dave-Gettleman-Draft-deep-at-OT-WR-RB-and-DL/b8a148ba-88ac-4545-b02f-43d8f2ec7e23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I'd agree, that it's coach speak, but listening to Gettleman's combine presser makes me doubt those thoughts.  At one point, he explained, "we're gonna draft the best guy, and if we have 5 stud guys at that position, and we're sitting there, and that position has the best guy, I'm taking him.  You can look at me like I got brain damage, but.... I'm gonna do it.  I'm just being honest guys."

 

That's BPA in the most literal sense I can imagine.  Maybe he's blowing smoke up people's asses, idk, but that's from the horse's mouth.

 

He says that at about the 3:45 mark.

http://www.panthers.com/media-vault/videos/Dave-Gettleman-Draft-deep-at-OT-WR-RB-and-DL/b8a148ba-88ac-4545-b02f-43d8f2ec7e23

 

I know. Every time that I referenced this in another thread, people didn't address it.  I just don't think that most people can wrap their mind around this concept---this hypothetical.  That's why I will be laughing my ass off the day that it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...