Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assume we can't get anyone else, who should start: Hayden or Favorite?


Sam Mills Fan

Nick Hayden or Marlon Favorite for starting DT?  

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Nick Hayden or Marlon Favorite for starting DT?

    • Nick Hayden
      7
    • Marlon Favorite
      16


Recommended Posts

yeah, hayden.

he was on that push back from the 1 yard line. wasn't as much a liability as he had been in other situations or as much as he could have been then.

still far from ideal, though.

I agree, as much as it pains me to say this Hayden has actually improved over the course of the preseason. Ideally he would be a decent rotational player but he is improving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been surprised the coaches have been so sold on Favorite, especially to see him getting first team reps instead of Irvin. Its sad the udfa has done better than our 3rd rounder. Anyone else want to admit that he was a bit of a stretch to be drafted then, like Dexter Jackson early...ok not that early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very interested in recent line up ran at the ravens. Moving Pep back to left Brown to the right and brayton at dt.

Before we start either i would rather 3-4 with pep, lewis, brayton. (lehman/johnson/diggs) connor beason davis.

passing downs brown brayton lewis pep davis beason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, as much as it pains me to say this Hayden has actually improved over the course of the preseason. Ideally he would be a decent rotational player but he is improving.

When did that happen I just thought the Ravens decide too work on their passing game. Hayden sucks and Favorite isn't much better. If we don't get someone better chalk this up too a bad D year. Maybe we can be like the Saints and outscore teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...