Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Leaked Batman v Superman Trailer


KissMyConverse

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Bumping this thread to say that I saw the BvS ultimate edition and it is so much better than the theaterical version. I'd give it a solid 8/10. Really enhances Supermans mind set throughout the movie and gives more understanding on why Batman and Superman don't like eachother. A lot got cut from the film. If you haven't seen the ultimate edition give it a shot. It's 3 hours but worth it imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

A lot of people gave it a much higher score after seeing the Ultimate Edition. I'm just pissed that WB can't seem to get out of their own way. This isn't the first CBM they've fugged with. Watchmen (another Snyder film) suffered from mediocre editing. The Director's Cut was far superior.

WB can't release a 3 hour R - Rated movie with dead bodies getting flame throwered. I understand why they had to make the cuts. Just sucks a lot of the scenes they cut really enhanced the overall movie and added much needed context to everything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Fair enough. It makes Snyder appear like a horrendous and incompetent director in the process though. He's not (despite possessing David Goyer's talents when coming to scripts). Zack deserves a ton of credit for the DCU. 

I mean he deserves some blame for writing/directing a script/movie that's 3 hours long and needs that much backstory to tell. But blame also needs to be put on WB for wanting this movie to be a soft JL boot. If they kept the story tight and only focused on the BvS part of the story it would have been a stronger movie. You save doomsday for the actual JL movie and all the problems virtually go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...