Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Automotive Window Tinting


Dex

Recommended Posts

A metallic film isn't gonna interfere with anything on your vehicle. The XM/FM antenna on the new Accord is located on the roof panel. The factory GPS antenna is located inside the front dash pad. Neither of those locations would be harmed by a metallic film.

Interference from metallic film occurs when the vehicle's antenna is surface glued to the rear window. And even then it's nothing extreme. Not many vehicles have those types of antennas anymore.

Ceramic is a superior film to metallic, but it's a waste of money in your application. You live in the NE, it doesn't even get hot there. Yes, ceramic will block more heat but you won't notice a difference unless it's in extreme temperatures. And you are going with an extremely light tint. 35% is almost not even worth bothering with tint. At that percentage the heat difference is even less noticeable.

The only thing you need to avoid is a dyed film because it will fade and crack over time. But none of the high end manufacturers or installers will even make or use that stuff so it's a moot point.

Llumar, Pinnacle, Global, 3M, etc; there are a lot of high quality film makers out there. It really doesn't matter, it's just personal preference. My current in-house tint pro uses Llumar, the guy before him used 3M. Never had a single issue with either product. And any reputable shop will stand behind their product and fix any issues that may occur.

I would also suggest doing a 5% strip across the top of your windshield to help reduce glare and reflections. Or you could even have the entire windshield done with a 70% film. Glass reflects light naturally and all vehicles have a certain amount of glare. When you tint your front windows it makes the glare worse because the light coming through your windshield is trapped and gets reflected back.

If you can get the ceramic for a comparable price go for it. But most shops will put a ridiculous markup on the ceramic vs metallic and try to market it as a vast superior product. That's how they make money. It's BS. It's a slightly better product, but it's not worth it if its a huge price difference.

Just make sure the shop uses a high quality brand and offers a warranty. Then just go with the best price you can find, don't waste your money.

Excellent informative post. Thank you!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have pied you post a million times if I could. Similar to people buying monster cable

Monster, Bose, Dre Beats, JL Audio, Kicker, etc. Walmart products at Tiffanys prices.

As far as cables, wires, etc:

Home:

monoprice.com

Auto:

knukonceptz.com

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spend a lot of time in traffic so the added privacy and UV protection will go a long way. The reason I'm doing 35% on the sides is because that's the legal limit in Connecticut. I was going for the ceramic because I always like to buy the best never half ass. Want prevails over need. I'd rather spend the extra $100-150 bucks and get the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spend a lot of time in traffic so the added privacy and UV protection will go a long way. The reason I'm doing 35% on the sides is because that's the legal limit in Connecticut. I was going for the ceramic because I always like to buy the best never half ass. Want prevails over need. I'd rather spend the extra $100-150 bucks and get the best.

Also the legal limit in NC, but cops don't bother you over it unless you're doing other illegal things or being a douche towards them. It's just a hassle getting your vehicle inspected unless you know someone.

Connecticut is probably a little stricter, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and to think I've been driving for 40 years without spending a dime on tinted windows..........

how the f*ck did I do it ??

PS........I drive 30-35K miles a year.

I'm not sure what your point is here. Care to list everything you spend money on?

I bet there's a lot of stuff you buy that others would consider crap and a waste of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spend a lot of time in traffic so the added privacy and UV protection will go a long way. The reason I'm doing 35% on the sides is because that's the legal limit in Connecticut. I was going for the ceramic because I always like to buy the best never half ass. Want prevails over need. I'd rather spend the extra $100-150 bucks and get the best.

I like my version better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm shopping around for a ceramic tint. Different shops carry different brands so its a pain in the ass. I've heard good things about suntek I'll check out viper. Does yours have a matte look?

No, it's semi-reflective. And 35% all around is the legal limit here but I go 20% because unless you have a dark interior 35% really isn't that dark during the day. The first car I tinted was black with a tan interior and 35% wasn't as effective as I had hoped, though it did cool the car. However, we routinely hit 100° or more here in KC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...