Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How long will it be....


Recommended Posts

So considering how the Panthers have been written off by nearly every major sports writer on the planet in this game and how the buccaneers under Garcia are the second coming of christ (after the 1 1/2th coming in Drew Brees dried up), how long will it be after the game that someone uses the phrase "This game wasn't won by Carolina, this game was lost by Tampa Bay through a lot of mistakes." Cause God knows, if Tampa wins it's because they're good. If Carolina wins, it'll be because Tampa was having a bad day. At least, if you listen to anyone on tv, that's how it's gonna seem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win, they just might crown us the ugliest 10-3 team ever. The Bucs, who have won all of their games in blowouts, never got down early to bad teams, and don't share a common problem with us, are completely different. They're going to be denying us until the very end because we were supposed to win 6-8 games at most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win, they just might crown us the ugliest 10-3 team ever. The Bucs, who have won all of their games in blowouts, never got down early to bad teams, and don't share a common problem with us, are completely different. They're going to be denying us until the very end because we were supposed to win 6-8 games at most.

This is untrue. We got down to bad & good teams on the road. This has been our problem all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True story ---------> On NFLN tonight, Terrell Davis (who I really dislike, even as a rb) was doubting that Carolina should be right behind the Giants in the NFC despite being 10-3 and with last night's game. He started saying that there are better teams out there, like the Eagles and the Cowboys and ....... Tampa. Jim Mora interrupted him and asked if Terrell had watched the same game last night that he had, "Are you kidding me?". TD did his little most annoying, "Well yeah", but he wasn't giving in. Said to ask him after the Giants game if the Panthers are a good team. :prrr: Asked Mora if he wanted to crown the Panthers right now and Mora said no but you can't say they aren't a good team.

We are going to hear this kind of b u l l s h i t discussion for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...