Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Can't Escape Mediocrity


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

Good Charlotte? The Hornets and the Sliding Scale of NBA Mediocrity - Zach Lowe

Zach Lowe wrote an article today concerning the state of the Hornets and how they can't seem to get out of their state of mediocrity. In the article it talks about how you have to be good building through the draft especially when Top Tier FAs won't be coming to Charlotte. We clearly haven't drafted well and this is what has put us in this position. It also touches on the relationship between Cho and Jordan. It seems like there's an implied rift but Cho is saying all the right things to say it's natural.

I loved this quote by Cho concerning Boston's proposed deal to us this past draft

“If it was such a no-brainer for us, why would another team want to do it?”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, everything move-wise can be justified, but that picture of the front office is just damning. Way too many cooks in the kitchen when it was thought that wouldn't be the case when Cho was hired.

First it was "let's build via the draft like the Thunder."

Then it was "let's grind out wins like Memphis."

Now it's "let's just shoot like Golden State."

MJ will never win the championship he's trying so hard to get if he doesn't stick to a plan designed to get us there.

What's sad is that one could reasonably argargue the moves MJ favored were better than Cho's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If our starting 5 is Walker-Batum-MKG-Frank-Al as the season progresses with Lamb and Lin being productive, we could be in decent shape.  We're also set up to have a clean slate in case we suck and really have a crack at the open market next season.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?

These "analysts" act like they have a crystal ball that they can use to see into the future. What a bunch of malarkey.

That really isn't a bold prediction at all, 4 mid-to-late lottery players combined will have a better career than one lottery player? I don't see how you can have a problem with that, that's true 99% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That really isn't a bold prediction at all, 4 mid-to-late lottery players combined will have a better career than one lottery player? I don't see how you can have a problem with that, that's true 99% of the time.

Speculation about those picks, and players we may have acquired who may or may not have panned out is just not even worth discussing. The various factors that you would have to take into account before even beginning to consider what contributions we may have gotten are ridiculous.

It's an unnecessary slight against Kaminsky, who hasn't even had an opportunity to play his first game as a Hornet with all his teammates yet.

Besides, we weren't the only team to turn down that rumored offer.

I'm just tired of seeing people poo on the guy. At least give him a chance to prove himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what it comes down to, is this: we haven't drafted well so we then are forced to try and make moves via FA and trades. Some of those moves we've made I've supported and others I haven't. Bottom line, most of the acquisitions haven't worked out even if they have looked like good deals to begin.

I'm more interested in the relationship between Cho and MJ after reading this article. Although, I highly doubt more info will emerge other than speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what it comes down to, is this: we haven't drafted well so we then are forced to try and make moves via FA and trades. Some of those moves we've made I've supported and others I haven't. Bottom line, most of the acquisitions haven't worked out even if they have looked like good deals to begin.

I'm more interested in the relationship between Cho and MJ after reading this article. Although, I highly doubt more info will emerge other than speculation.

the truth is that I'm not sure we've drafted a single player in the past six or so drafts that has outperformed their draft position. And so you are correct, our drafting sucks ass and that's why we suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief, this place is like a suicide hotline.

You can't live in the past forever. We're due some good luck.

I remember getting excited over Hurney's spending spree after 2-14 and alot of the moves he made, too. It's fan nature to try and justify the moves of the team you root for.

But this is exasperating. It's not so much a suicide hotline as it is coming to terms with the fact that 1. We don't have very good young talent  (and certainly not enough to justify passing up multiple first rounders) 2. We passed on Justise Winslow with offers on the table and most alarming 3. Our front office clearly doesn't have a cohesive direction, let alone know what it's doing.

I am all for being a homer, but eventually you gotta call it like it is. Lowe is not some Fansided hack. He's a good, fair writer and that's a good, fair piece. It's completely fair to question why this franchise has zero playoff wins in its existence and doesn't appear to be headed toward a title anytime soon.

But who am I kidding. This is the same board that has skewered Gettleman despite the great draft picks, savvy FA signings and willingness to make the tough, not-well-liked moves with an eye on the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember getting excited over Hurney's spending spree after 2-14 and alot of the moves he made, too. It's fan nature to try and justify the moves of the team you root for.

But this is exasperating. It's not so much a suicide hotline as it is coming to terms with the fact that 1. We don't have very good young talent  (and certainly not enough to justify passing up multiple first rounders) 2. We passed on Justise Winslow with offers on the table and most alarming 3. Our front office clearly doesn't have a cohesive direction, let alone know what it's doing.

I am all for being a homer, but eventually you gotta call it like it is. Lowe is not some Fansided hack. He's a good, fair writer and that's a good, fair piece. It's completely fair to question why this franchise has zero playoff wins in its existence and doesn't appear to be headed toward a title anytime soon.

But who am I kidding. This is the same board that has skewered Gettleman despite the great draft picks, savvy FA signings and willingness to make the tough, not-well-liked moves with an eye on the future.

Minus the bit I pointed out, I'm not knocking the article, it's truth obviously.

This franchise has a bad history. We know that. Now you can either live in that history, and allow it to define you, or you can move forward.

I'm sorry, but anyone still moping around at this point about passing on Justice Winslow might need to get their life in order.

I'd rather be optimistic, and no I don't mean absurd expectations about winning, like a complete homer. Just being competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
    • Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
×
×
  • Create New...