Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther's draft picks


Lt Pinkerton

Recommended Posts

If you also count guys that came onto the team from a undrafted rookie status, even if we signed them away from another team, that number goes even higher. The number of "outsiders" that came to the team as high profile FA is very, very low. The only ones I can think of is Kemo, Lewis, Brayton, C. Harris, Lenord, Diggs, Johnson, Delhomme, McCown, Vincient, Baker and Janson. Kasay would technically be a FA brought in but after 15 years I don't think you can consider him an "outsider". Even if you did that would only be 13 players leaving 40 of the 53 draft picks or undrafted rookies or waiver claims ect.

And when you look at that list of "outsiders", most of them where outcasts before coming to the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its good..but the panthers FO..is very stubborn about geting rid of draft picks..even when they suck..
And why wouldn't they be? If you have a guy on the bubble that you drafted and the alternative is a guy on the bubble that came here as a free agent, wouldn't you want the draft pick? They're usually cheaper and have been in the system longer.

Here's a list of our "homegrown" talent. Which ones suck and should be cut?

> 3 years on the squad:

Muhsin Muhammad, Brad Hoover, Steve Smith, Julius Peppers, Dante Wesley, Jordan Gross, Chris Gamble, Travelle Wharton, Thomas Davis, James Anderson, Jeff King, Richard Marshall, DeAngelo Williams

3rd year players:

Jon Beason, Dwayne Jarrett, Charles Johnson, Ryan Kalil, Matt Moore, Dante Rosario, Quinton Teal, C.J. Wilson

2nd year players:

Gary Barnidge, Mackenzy Bernadeau, Dan Connor, Charles Godfrey, Jeff Otah, Jonathan Stewart, Hilee Taylor, Nick Hayden, Geoff Schwartz

Rookies:

Everette Brown, Tony Fiammetta, Mike Goodson, Sherrod Martin, Captain Munnerlyn, Duke Robinson, Garry Williams

So with those names, who do you think the Panthers should give up on in favor of a free agent? And kindly name a free agent they had a shot at--we all know Haynesworth is better than Hayden but this isn't fantasy-land.

So who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And why wouldn't they be? If you have a guy on the bubble that you drafted and the alternative is a guy on the bubble that came here as a free agent, wouldn't you want the draft pick? They're usually cheaper and have been in the system longer.

Here's a list of our "homegrown" talent. Which ones suck and should be cut?

> 3 years on the squad:

Muhsin Muhammad, Brad Hoover, Steve Smith, Julius Peppers, Dante Wesley, Jordan Gross, Chris Gamble, Travelle Wharton, Thomas Davis, James Anderson, Jeff King, Richard Marshall, DeAngelo Williams

3rd year players:

Jon Beason, Dwayne Jarrett, Charles Johnson, Ryan Kalil, Matt Moore, Dante Rosario, Quinton Teal, C.J. Wilson

2nd year players:

Gary Barnidge, Mackenzy Bernadeau, Dan Connor, Charles Godfrey, Jeff Otah, Jonathan Stewart, Hilee Taylor, Nick Hayden, Geoff Schwartz

Rookies:

Everette Brown, Tony Fiammetta, Mike Goodson, Sherrod Martin, Captain Munnerlyn, Duke Robinson, Garry Williams

So with those names, who do you think the Panthers should give up on in favor of a free agent? And kindly name a free agent they had a shot at--we all know Haynesworth is better than Hayden but this isn't fantasy-land.

So who?

Dante Wesley

James Anderson

Dwayne Jarrett

Quinton Teal, C.J. Wilson

Geoff Schwartz

Nick Hayden

Garry Williams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice generalizations. That's all you have though, no substance, no facts, just an idea that we can just snap our fingers and get more talent on the roster.

Are you aware that you're dropping three drafted players entering their third year, two entering their second, and a rookie? That makes no sense. I guess you would have replaced Kalil because he didn't start his first year, huh? How about Hoover, I doubt he would have made your cut.

And are you planning on replacing all these guys with starting-caliber players? Aside from the lack of room under our cap, why would a potential starter come here if they weren't going to get any playing time anyway? And if you can't get a potential starter, how are the ones you're going to get an improvement on what we have?

By the way, Wesley was a starter in Miami. And you can get a free agent starter from Cincinnati in Landon Johnson who really doesn't look like an improvement on James Anderson.

So what you're saying makes no sense to me at all. It's like telling the team to go win a Super Bowl--if it was that easy everyone would do it.

It probably feels good to just criticize the front office, as if you could do better. But I don't think you thought it through very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...