Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers - Jags Preview and Analysis


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some of the things that struck me as I prepared these tables included the very obvious fact that Jacksonville is a team being rebuilt.

A full third of the Jacksonville team is NEW:  7 of their starters slated to play on Sunday (i.e. not counting those out with injuries, but counting their replacements instead) have never played with Jacksonville before.  This includes 1 rookie and 6 free agents signed for 2015.   Another 8 starters have 1 season with Jacksonville - 6 of whom were rookies last year, and so are in their second season in the NFL.  That is an INCREDIBLE 15 players (71% of the team's starters!) with only 0 - 1 year of experience with the team.

By contrast for Carolina we have 4 new free agents starting (including Kyle Love who will replace Star) and 1 rookie.  Note I did NOT count Ted Ginn as a new free agent since he played for Carolina in 2013.  We have a pretty high number of 1st year players with Carolina as well - 7 starters with 1 year of experience on the team, 4 of whom were rookies last year, 3 of whom are veteran free agents.  So for Carolina the total is 12 players with 0 - 1 year of time with the team (57% - still a pretty high figure, but not nearly as eye-popping as Jacksonville's %).

Jacksonville is also in worse shape with injuries than we are, with 3 of their starters slated to sit out (2 of whom are among their best players), while Carolina only has Star sitting out that we know of (also one of our best players).  The replacements for all 3 JAX players are rated "below average" by PFF, but so too is Kyle Love, our replacement for Star.  Of course, as we've seen with Love, he's played well in preseason, so those ratings from last year may not reflect current play.  But for Jacksonville, their already low average rankings for their starters got lower because of the players not starting.  For Carolina, the difference was tiny.

Jacksonville starters on Offense are CONSIDERABLY YOUNGER and LESS EXPERIENCED than Carolina's offense.  For defense, the stats are pretty similar in terms of age & experience for both teams, but as noted above, Carolina has a BIG advantage in CONTINUITY, on both offense & defense, with our players on average having played together 1 - 1.5 years longer than their JAX counterparts.

Looking at the players position by position, there's not too much to be said, most of the conclusions are pretty obvious.  But a few notes:

On Offense:  Carolina looks to have the advantage at QB, RB, TE.  WRs and OLine rankings are pretty similar for both teams.  CAR has a tiny edge in WR, while JAX has a small edge in OLine rankings overall.  However JAX has less continuity of their OLine, with 2 new starters added this year in contrast to Carolina only adding 1 new starter, Michael Oher.

On Defense:  CAR has the advantage at DT.  Kony Ealy's "Poor" ranking by PFF means CAR & JAX average out to a matching ranking for DE.  For LBs, obviously it's no contest.  We rank better for CBs, while JAX has a small edge on Safeties.  Carolina's overall defensive ranking is a full point/category higher than Jacksonville's and our continuity is better on defense.

I know we've all heard the stories that Blake Bortles is playing so much better in the preseason, but in light of these comparisons, I really can't see much reason at all to favor Jacksonville.  Based on the quality of our starters, we SHOULD win this game quite easily.  The huge difference in continuity with Carolina's offense and defense having more time to jell and learn how to play together should be a significant advantage for Carolina.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last set of tables, and these in some ways are the clearest of all to show that we should have the edge on offense, defense and as a team.  I've summed up the numbers of players per team in each PFF category, and then also looked at the same for the offense and the defense.  Wow.  The quality of Carolina's starters in comparison with JAX is striking.

Car-v-Jax-PFF.thumb.png.0751062a57926aa2

A full 50% of our starters (11 players) rank as good, very good or elite, compared with a total of only 3 JAX players (14%).  I'd remembered hearing that Jacksonville's defense was better than its offense, but a full 45% of their defensive starters rank below average, though those figures, as true for Carolina as well, are lowered by injuries.  Surprisingly for all our handwringing about offense, we only have 1 of our starters (Oher) or 9% ranked below average, vs. 4 players (36%) for JAX.

Now we just need to translate all this nice data in our favor into a VERY CONVINCING WIN on the field!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T'would appear that we have some young analytics enthusiasts on the Huddle now.

I do a lot of data organization and analysis for my job, so my brain is kind of trained to think in these terms.  Also, creating spreadsheets, etc. helps me learn and remember important data.

But I would never claim that all football is statistics.  There are a lot of intangibles or things that are difficult to measure in terms of how players interact that lead to success or failure.  One player, one play can swing a game or a season far beyond what the "stats" would ever lead one to believe.

So, I enjoy looking at the stats, but know there's a lot more to following a team and understanding what makes it tick.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do a lot of data organization and analysis for my job, so my brain is kind of trained to think in these terms.  Also, creating spreadsheets, etc. helps me learn and remember important data.

But I would never claim that all football is statistics.  There are a lot of intangibles or things that are difficult to measure in terms of how players interact that lead to success or failure.  One player, one play can swing a game or a season far beyond what the "stats" would ever lead one to believe.

So, I enjoy looking at the stats, but know there's a lot more to following a team and understanding what makes it tick.

You're a good poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UM.... WOW.... it's very late in my time zone and perhaps I'm misreading something, but I just took a look at the Infographic posted on Panthers.com as a game preview with CAR & JAX stats from 2014.

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Infographic-Week-1-Preview-/cceef6ae-73a2-44c6-851e-2455a97b0dd7

It seems to me the stats are all wrong.  CAR should lead JAX in Yards, points per game etc. 

Where did these numbers come from?!?!?!?

Can someone else check the NFL.Com stats page and verify I'm not crazy for thinking there is something VERY wrong with this infographic?

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?seasonType=REG&offensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=TOTAL_POINTS_GAME_AVG&tabSeq=2&season=2014&role=TM&Submit=Go&archive=true&conference=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&qualified=false

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the position by position comparison for the OFFENSE of both teams:

CAR-JAX_Offense.thumb.png.5e07b1bc2c2deb

KB...You're the freakin' man, dude. I'm serious. Really appreciative of what you bring to The Huddle and can't thank you enough for your info and knowledge you provide. We're very like-minded in many ways about the game of football and your analytical way of using stats to predict match-ups is second to none as far as I'm concerned. 

We're kindred Panther/football fans and I'm full of gratitude for your efforts, observations and optimism. Great stuff bro! If you don't get lots of positive reinforcement from the rest of the Huddle, I'm happy to oblige. 

I officially put you on a permanent 5-star respectability level on the Huddle with no need for any type of petition. 

Jam-on my brother! I got a free bar-tab in your honor if we ever run in to one another some day. God put some good stuff in that mind of yours and you should be gettin' paid for your time doing what you do. 

Thanks again and keep pounding!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I think the stats should be (rounded figures for yards...):

Stat                                  CAR            JAX

Yards per game                347             290

Passing Yards                   219            188

Rushing Yards                   127             102

Points per game                 21.2            15.6

I'm not on Facebook, so I can't log on to comment at Panthers.com to tell them about the errors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words @TheNewStandard

It's nice to have been able to contribute to the discussion here.  I'm such a new Panthers fan (really only since mid-late 2012) that I can't bring a knowledge of Panthers history.  I'm also not a football expert in terms of understanding all the plays and strategies..., so stats analysis is one thing I can focus on, and enjoy.

I hope I haven't set up unrealistic expectations though.  I've had an unusual amount of downtime the past 6 weeks or so, thus my extensive posting as kind of a special "summer hobby," but my time for such intensive analysis is drawing to a close quickly.  My posting may get quite limited starting on Monday.  I've got two big reports and funding proposals to write in the next 5 weeks.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Carolina loses this game, heads are gonna roll and I'm gonna puke my guts out.

Dang man...glad you're working and hope you're getting paid good, but I'm gonna miss your contributions here...hopefully somebody else will step up. I would, but all I have access to right now is my cell phone and just don't have the resources to lay it out here. So my apologies to you and the rest of the Huddle. What say you Huddle?

Edited by TheNewStandard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Team is going to look mighty different and while I’d love to keep our guys. I’m going to go a different route and bring in a bunch of new guys. I’ll break it down by line: Guentzel - Aho - Jarvis (Bringing Guentzel back along with RFA Jarvis is a no brainer) Svechnikov - Unger-Sorum - Toffoli (Throw FUS into the fire and give him two goal scorers in Svech and FA Toffoli to feed. Teravainen - Kuznetsov - Noesen (Bring Turbo back on a discount and bring back our only net front in Noesen) Martinook - Staal - Fast (Bring back Martinook and reunite the MAF line) Extra: Lemieux (The perfect extra) Slavin - Carrier (Burns is declining, bring in Alex Carrier who I’m a big fan of) Byram - Burns (Ship Necas to Buffalo for Byram) Orlov - Chatfield (Bringing back Chatfield is a no brainer) Extra: Morrow (He’ll get his chance) Kochetkov (It’s his time) Andersen (Only a couple years left) Martin (Most of his time will be in the AHL) First Call-Up’s: Nadeau, Blake Trade: Necas (He’ll be too expensive, trade him for a top 4 LD) Trade: Kotkaniemi (Probably won’t get anything for him, just attach a pick to him and be done with it) Walk: Pesce (Getting older, will be expensive, play will decline soon) Walk: Skjei (This one hurts the most but we won’t be able to afford him) Walk: Drury (Staal is still better than him at this point and they are redundant) Walk: DeAngelo (Thank you for your service) Walk: Raanta (Hopefully he retires) Walk: Tieksola, Murray, Burke (Better AHL options out there) Re-Sign: Comtois (Throw him in the AHL so we have a guy to protect our prospects) Re-Sign: Suzuki (Good depth for our AHL team) Re-Sign: Coghlan (Good AHL player) Re-Sign: Mendel (Good AHL player) Re-Sign: Smith (Good AHL player)  
    • So the Huddle thinks he is either a youth pastor or Ted Bundy. I honestly love it! Let's just hope he can coach in his off time!
    • Yeah that is the old school way, have your young QB sit. Which I guess got less popular when they had to pay the top draftees so much.   
×
×
  • Create New...