Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yeah, after what I just witnessed


heelsrule1988

Recommended Posts

There is zero chance that the Seahawks beat us. And that doesn't mean exactly what you think it means. It means that if we lose, it won't be because they beat us... it will be because we beat ourselves. If we finally get consistency on offense, you can take 5-0 to the bank. It's a fact. This team is not nearly what they used to be. And we already know we can hang with them to begin with. So like I said... if we get ourselves together on offense, it's over. We've absolutely got this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is zero chance that the Seahawks beat us. And that doesn't mean exactly what you think it means. It means that if we lose, it won't be because they beat us... it will be because we beat ourselves. If we finally get consistency on offense, you can take 5-0 to the bank. It's a fact. This team is not nearly what they used to be. And we already know we can hang with them to begin with. So like I said... if we get ourselves together on offense, it's over. We've absolutely got this.

Agree 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are trash. Our D will score more points on them than their O. Josh alone will actually score more points on them than their O will on us. So fuging pumped to break their collective jaws.

That's the funny thing... even if our offense doesn't get its act together, the Seahawks aren't scoreboard-busters so what you just mentioned could win the game for us by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After all that blatant homerism before the Saints game, predicting a blow out, you would think some of these guys learn a damn lesson.

Some of you guys just can't wait to jinx us, I swear.

If you noticed, I said "if our offense gets itself together". Because that is a huge problem right now. And I also said that it's possible we could beat ourselves. The only thing I guaranteed is that the Seahawks won't win the game by being flat-out better than us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you noticed, I said "if our offense gets itself together". Because that is a huge problem right now. And I also said that it's possible we could beat ourselves. The only thing I guaranteed is that the Seahawks won't win the game by being flat-out better than us.

"zero chance they beat us" is a pretty strong statement regardless.

They look weakened a little, but they are still the same team that we have yet to beat, and we will be playing them in their house. I get we are 4-0, but you best believe that they are going to play us as if their season is on the line.

I'm all for optimism, but blatantly downplaying them as if we will walk all over them is absurd. We are more than capable of winning, but it's going to be a damn tough game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...