Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam and Co get some love from NY Times


blackcat

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

lol at the Drudge pissing match.

I, too, think it's funny.  Yeah, I visit Drudge often, but for no obvious political reasons, you can find interesting stuff in there, especially if you take interest in what's happening in the world and not just our country.  

Honestly, you don't see too many sports stories on there, so when you do and it's about your QB, it's worth noting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, blackcat said:

I, too, think it's funny.  Yeah, I visit Drudge often, but for no obvious political reasons, you can find interesting stuff in there, especially if you take interest in what's happening in the world and not just our country.  

Honestly, you don't see too many sports stories on there, so when you do and it's about your QB, it's worth noting.  

I just saw a link to a Bond movie article on Drudge.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-spectre-heading-75m-837618

No way I'm going to that movie now, obviously 007 is a  Product of the KKK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Captain Obvious said:

VISITS TO DRUDGE 11/07/15

023,689,549 PAST 24 HOURS
688,631,667 PAST 31 DAYS
8,453,259,973 PAST YEAR

 

holy crap that's a bunch of bigoted racists. 

Not in this debate, but those numbers could easily be skewed. Those could be general hits, not unique views, so they could be counting refreshes, page redirects, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18k1kpu2r8p26jpg.jpg

aug-15-drudge-report.jpg

original.png

BAL79MxCQAID-Ud.png

20111108-drudge_treetax.jpg

A_x97NlCIAAN9He.jpg




i don't need to go on. linking to external articles does not grant objectivity, because framing is just as important as content. from the moment matt drudge quit the kansas city star to break the lewinsky scandal he had a frothing constituency base waiting with open arms to be led in ideology and information. drudge report is designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator of voters who latch onto bumpersticker philosophies and lazy, analysisless, bias-conforming echo chambers as the mainstay of their social and political ideology.

as a former extremely conservative racist white supremacist who this time ten years ago was campaigning for vernon robinson (remember him?) i spent years trawling drudge for all my news. it was my go-to, my default.

again, you should be embarrassed to utilize it. i sure as hell am now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

18k1kpu2r8p26jpg.jpg

aug-15-drudge-report.jpg

original.png

BAL79MxCQAID-Ud.png

20111108-drudge_treetax.jpg

A_x97NlCIAAN9He.jpg




i don't need to go on. linking to external articles does not grant objectivity, because framing is just as important as content. from the moment matt drudge quit the kansas city star to break the lewinsky scandal he had a frothing constituency base waiting with open arms to be led in ideology and information. drudge report is designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator of voters who latch onto bumpersticker philosophies and lazy, analysisless, bias-conforming echo chambers as the mainstay of their social and political ideology.

as a former extremely conservative racist white supremacist who this time ten years ago was campaigning for vernon robinson (remember him?) i spent years trawling drudge for all my news. it was my go-to, my default.

again, you should be embarrassed to utilize it. i sure as hell am now.

Didn't  utilize it to propagate a political agenda.  Sounds like you did, which is fine, we live in a country which promotes that.  I simply found it interesting that  the NY Times showed interest in our QB and our team.   Let's relax and enjoy some respect for our team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...