Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Bears trade for Cutler.


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

Cutler: 17/36, 277 yards, 1 TD, 4 INTs

Delhomme: 7/17, 73 yares, 0 TD, 4 INTs, 1 Fumble

No contest

That's like being winner of the tallest midget contest, especially given the way that final interception went. I'd add that little shove of Clay Matthews wasn't exactly a shining moment.

Cutler didn't respond well in a pressure situation yesterday. That's a worry, especially with the Steelers coming in.

With that said, there's plenty of time to correct it, if he responds well to coaching. But even if that happens, the Bears have a number of other issues too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's like being winner of the tallest midget contest, especially given the way that final interception went. I'd add that little shove of Clay Matthews wasn't exactly a shining moment.

I really don't care about the shove- I'd rather see some fire from my QB then a roll over and die, who cares attitude. I agree that it's not much of anything to hang his hat upon, but he DID get the players around him involved- his #1 WR was part of the mix, got a TD and other players were in it as well... that can't be said about Delhomme, unfortunately. What did Smitty end up with? 23 yards or something?

Cutler didn't respond well in a pressure situation yesterday. That's a worry, especially with the Steelers coming in.

I actually disagree with you there- he had a horrible 1st half, then came out for the second half and led the Bears to scores on 3 out of 5 possessions. Other than the final INT, I think he did a good job of manning up in the face of adversity... he had his team in the lead with 2 minutes left in the game... so he didn't completely poo the bed... which can't be said about Delhomme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: at fuzzstradamus

Thanks for the week 1 end all, be all judgment... talk to me again after week 17

Don't worry, I will.

I just laugh at any fanbase that thinks that they had jesus in pads given to them. I guess I am more of a guarded optimism type of person.

Someone got rid of him for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry, I will.

I just laugh at any fanbase that thinks that they had jesus in pads given to them. I guess I am more of a guarded optimism type of person.

Someone got rid of him for some reason.

Lest you've been living under a rock, I think everyone understands that Jay's exit from Denver was not related to his level of play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay will improve, the pass rush is back and the secondary actually played better than most expected it to, except for that last play or lack there-of by Vasher(who tackled well most of the night). O-line needs run blocking improvement and the Urlacher/Pisa losses are frightening. Hopefully my Bears can fill the voids and continue on w/o too much relapse. GB and Chicago punched eachother in the throat for 60 minutes and the Bears suffered the biggest losses while Minnesota beat the all worldly Browns and the Lions continued to be the Lions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lest you've been living under a rock, I think everyone understands that Jay's exit from Denver was not related to his level of play

Didn't say it was because of play, although it has more to do with it than you may want to accept.

I would say that quote about any FA signing in which a team gives up MASSIVE amounts of anything to get said player.

Somebody got rid of him for a reason.

The Bears coaches and FO gambled their jobs, lets see if they win big or crap out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...