Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are We Week 17 Flex Candidates?


KendrickPanther

Recommended Posts

If the Carolina Panthers are going for the 16-0 Perfect season, do they flex us to prime time? When the Patriots played the Giants in week 17 on NFL Network they made a special exception and aired the game over Network Television. A precedence has been set for making a big deal out of this milestone. 

Our opponent, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are surging. They are currently on 6 wins with the following opponents:   

Saints @ Home 

Rams Away

Bears @ Home 

It's possible they could run the table and be playing for a 10 win season and Wild Card spot. 

The other games will be enticing. Card & Seahawks, Packers & Viking, and of course any NFC East Championship game always gets flexed.

Tickets for that Buccaneers game are absurdly high on NFL Ticket Exchange right now. Lower Bowl Seats start over $300. I would personally love to throw a party in Charlotte that Sunday night. We can invite Rodney to step out of his Ivory tower in NYC and see whats up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

info from: http://sports.morganwick.com/category/football/nfl/snf-flex-scheduling-watch/

For Week 17, NBC will only show a game with major playoff implications. That pretty much rules out TBvsCAR.

For Week 16: FOX will likely keep CARvsATL due to not wanting to lose out revenue. Could they move the game to 4p? Depends on whether CAR has cinched the first round bye or not, IMO.  

Week 15, I could see NBC grabbing CARvsNYG for two reasons: CAR being undefeated and NYG having a broad national appeal with Eli etc... but the Giants may have already played their max number of National Games (there's a rule for that?).

HTH

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JJT said:

Obviously, you do not understand humor. 

I understand humor, but you aren't funny.

You weren't funny when you interrupted a discussion about football to incorrectly proclaim it grammatically incorrect for someone to use the word "gift" as a verb -- something you were wrong about, by the way. You weren't funny when you complained about dictionaries and the historical present tense. You weren't funny when you said, "never verb nouns." And you weren't funny when you quoted me and said I don't understand humor.

No one enjoys reading those kinds of posts. The best reaction you can hope for from that kind of mess is not a chuckle, but an eye roll.

I think most people are here to talk about football, not the proper use of the Oxford comma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I am fine with rostering 3 QB's. A older vet/gamble on a younger, "distressed asset" vet and a drafted QB.  At least there are some options to roll through when Bryce is just Bryce again.
    • I’ve been thinking about it since I said it.  1st rounders would be expected to make multiple psa’s.  But you’re right, after that there are no real expectations as it’s a shot in the dark for QBs that aren’t drafted in the 1st. Add to that, it’s kind of an inverse effect.  The later the QB is drafted, the better the team (potentially) they go to.  So you could actually set the bar higher in this category for QBs drafted in the later rounds?
    • If you have been in college as long as Nussmeier and you are a one read QB, you are not an NFL QB. That's a 6th/7th rounder even with the size/arm.
×
×
  • Create New...