Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Jan 17 1:00


goodoleboy

Recommended Posts

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, goodoleboy said:

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Icebox said:

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Who is to say its tougher for us? The teams that couldn't get it done in their division have to play on the road. The only change to the NFC wildcard seeding would be Green Bay would play Washington at home if they seeded your way. Everything else stays the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

We have Home Field throughout. How could anyone whine about that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean both defenses are some of the best if not the best two in the country. Main difference in the game is Ohio State scored on 4th and goal and Texas didn’t. Arch doesn’t look good but anyone saying he’s a scrub or a bust after literally his first game against a high quality opponent is just a hater. Sark doesn’t seem to have any answers either. 
    • AT was basically Greg Olsen-ish for Bryce.  In so many ways.  He was keeping stuff on right page and really more of small TE than actual slot WR out there.  Canales isn’t going to be able to just insert Hunter into that role on the O that AT was doing.   Hunter is a true slot WR.  And a niche one at that.    Might take some time to try to figure out plays/calls really insert Renfrow into.  Thats not really Canales’ base what Hunter does so well  
    • Terrible. Texas has had 4 or 5 drives that started near midfield and have nothing. OSU is defending champs but they lost 14 players in the draft, including a ton on the DL. It looks like they don’t trust the heisman favorite. Maybe this is why he couldn’t beat out Ewers. Maybe he’ll pick it up but damn this is his third year in college. It feels like a game plan when you have to start a freshman or third stringer due to injuries.
×
×
  • Create New...