Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks 1-7 all time in temps less than 28 degrees


cardiackat88.

Recommended Posts

Source: http://www.foxsports.com/north/story/minnesota-vikings-seattle-seahawks-could-cold-freeze-out-temperatures-010516

Very interesting....

"

The Seattle Seahawks have traditionally not done well in freezing temperatures. Advantage, Minnesota Vikings?

According to the National Weather Service, the high in Minneapolis for Sunday's NFC wild-card game is 1. Wait, scratch that. It's a high near 1.

Needless to say, Seattle has never played in a game that cold in its franchise history. In fact, Seattle has hosted a game just once below freezing (a 31-degree game on Dec. 21, 2008).

The Seahawks are 1-7 in games played in which the temperature is less than 28 degrees."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Source: http://www.foxsports.com/north/story/minnesota-vikings-seattle-seahawks-could-cold-freeze-out-temperatures-010516

Very interesting....

"

The Seattle Seahawks have traditionally not done well in freezing temperatures. Advantage, Minnesota Vikings?

According to the National Weather Service, the high in Minneapolis for Sunday's NFC wild-card game is 1. Wait, scratch that. It's a high near 1.

Needless to say, Seattle has never played in a game that cold in its franchise history. In fact, Seattle has hosted a game just once below freezing (a 31-degree game on Dec. 21, 2008).

The Seahawks are 1-7 in games played in which the temperature is less than 28 degrees."

Doesnt matter if Vikings defense and passing game doesnt show up. They have a good chance of winning long as they stay aggresive on offense and allow Birdgwater to do more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 15 said:

Mother of god I have never seen a fan base so scared of another team before. Every thread in this forum is about why Minnesota can pull off the upset so we don't have to play Seattle. Man the fug up you guys are straight up embarrassing...

Were only talking about the team that has gone to the Super Bowl the last two years, back to back. Nothing to worry about I suppose...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Because a team with players who didn't win in 1992 somehow has an effect on a team playing in 2016? We could maybe make a connection if it was the same players in a more recent year, but to go back to 1992 is just dumb imho. 

This is why using stats as your only basis for anything is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lately on the Huddle:

OMG look at how obsessed the Seahawks are with us!!!

OMG look at what the Seahawks said about Cam

Minnesota is going to beat the Seahawks...

Look at the Seahawks message board..

Cam is better than Russell Wilson

Seattle's fan base is all bandwagon fans.

I think Russell Wilson's water is mixed with Viagra and sweat from Ciarra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) the dumb Russell Wilson water jokes have reached Cam laptop territory and are stupid and unoriginal now

 

2) I'm so tired of seeing little panther bandwagon fans soil their briches about Seattle because merril hoge or whomever told them to. 

 

I hope we play Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
    • Cooter was a good dude for sure. 
    • We both been here about the same amount of time. Whatever happened to Livermush? I know Cooter passed aways years ago...and so many others?
×
×
  • Create New...