Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Not Matt Moore


louiepanthers

Recommended Posts

I have been a panthers fan since the first snap and I think we should start Matt its his time now Jake is almost 35 now and he is a old fart Matt is only 24 and last time his name got called when we screwed him for old ass Vinny I felt realy bad now we sign Feeley who has 29 picks and 29 td's in his career I just think fox needs to go and Hurney I have faith in Moore whoever agrees with me let me no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the Panthers even keeping Matt Moore,if they don't have enough confidence in him to be the #2 QB.

I say give the kid a chance,he can't be any worse than the career backups that are constantly being brought in.

Mark my words,when and if,Matt Moore leaves the Panthers,some team will be getting a good potential starting QB,or at least a capable backup.

QB is a position the Fox/Hurney staff don't seem to value very highly and it is coming back to bite them,and i fear the worst is yet to come,in that respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the Panthers even keeping Matt Moore,if they don't have enough confidence in him to be the #2 QB.

I say give the kid a chance,he can't be any worse than the career backups that are constantly being brought in.

Mark my words,when and if,Matt Moore leaves the Panthers,some team will be getting a good potential starting QB,or at least a capable backup.

QB is a position the Fox/Hurney staff don't seem to value very highly and it is coming back to bite them,and i fear the worst is yet to come,in that respect.

i agree..we need to give moore a chance..jake and aj are both old and washed up..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sweet, another brand new dumbass posting a poorly-formed threat about a worn-to-death topic discussed by other like-minded dumbasses. i love these

I don't see a problem with people posting question if they are fans of a team. Right if you are a fan of this team you have a question or 3. Why not Matt Moore he has been kept on the roster for 3 years. That is more time then Jake had with the team when he took over for Peete. He has the same amount of wins under his belt as Jake had when he took over for Peete. One thing you can say about Moore is in the short time we seen him he has led the team on Drives down the field.

I think it is f'n stupid for a person too question other people for looking for anwser for a team they love and suffer with when the team gets it's doors blown off. Or acts like a f'n idiot when people post a opinion on a opinion Board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having trouble understanding this as well. Matt Moore has proven that he can win with the starters. His teammates have a lot of faith in him and play hard for him. He is perfectly capable of managing this run-first offense. Most importantly, he won't turn the ball over five times in a game. There must be something going on behind the scenes that we don't know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good thought and I agree.  Nothing about this process compromises that premise. In fact, the process involves meeting more needs so you can do that.  If I can get an Edge on a rookie contract when my biggest need is LB, then I have enough $$ saved on the overall cap to get an elite rookie edge in the draft and sign a veteran LB in free agency. If I draft the LB first, my biggest need, then my savings against the cap (when looking at the 53-man roster) is minimal.  I have not saved enough $$ to sign the edge in free agency, so I have to try to draft the edge later, getting a lesser player.  Even if you draft an edge and the roster is full of them, you have trade capital because a lot of teams need a good edge.  This lends credence to the BPA theory if it is aligned with positions that are expensive on second contracts. In the cap era, you have to think it through-it is like a puzzle.   That is why I did not like it when Marty was drafting RBs (Willliams and Stewart) in the first round.  If you recall, that necessitated moving up for Otah, trading away next year's first rounder to do so.  That is the draft we really needed an edge, but since we did not have a first rounder, we took Everette Brown to fill that need.  Then it got worse.  We had 2 RBs on second contracts, Brown busted, that led to drafting Clausen, etc.  If you can get 2 starters for the price of one, that is what I would call smart--not overthinking, if I understand you.  I do agree, but that does not mean draft your trench players first.   It could mean draft an edge and use the cap savings to sign a trench player.
    • The DLine needs to do its job too - currently I only trust Brown to do that.
×
×
  • Create New...