Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Not Matt Moore


louiepanthers

Recommended Posts

I have been a panthers fan since the first snap and I think we should start Matt its his time now Jake is almost 35 now and he is a old fart Matt is only 24 and last time his name got called when we screwed him for old ass Vinny I felt realy bad now we sign Feeley who has 29 picks and 29 td's in his career I just think fox needs to go and Hurney I have faith in Moore whoever agrees with me let me no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the Panthers even keeping Matt Moore,if they don't have enough confidence in him to be the #2 QB.

I say give the kid a chance,he can't be any worse than the career backups that are constantly being brought in.

Mark my words,when and if,Matt Moore leaves the Panthers,some team will be getting a good potential starting QB,or at least a capable backup.

QB is a position the Fox/Hurney staff don't seem to value very highly and it is coming back to bite them,and i fear the worst is yet to come,in that respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the Panthers even keeping Matt Moore,if they don't have enough confidence in him to be the #2 QB.

I say give the kid a chance,he can't be any worse than the career backups that are constantly being brought in.

Mark my words,when and if,Matt Moore leaves the Panthers,some team will be getting a good potential starting QB,or at least a capable backup.

QB is a position the Fox/Hurney staff don't seem to value very highly and it is coming back to bite them,and i fear the worst is yet to come,in that respect.

i agree..we need to give moore a chance..jake and aj are both old and washed up..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sweet, another brand new dumbass posting a poorly-formed threat about a worn-to-death topic discussed by other like-minded dumbasses. i love these

I don't see a problem with people posting question if they are fans of a team. Right if you are a fan of this team you have a question or 3. Why not Matt Moore he has been kept on the roster for 3 years. That is more time then Jake had with the team when he took over for Peete. He has the same amount of wins under his belt as Jake had when he took over for Peete. One thing you can say about Moore is in the short time we seen him he has led the team on Drives down the field.

I think it is f'n stupid for a person too question other people for looking for anwser for a team they love and suffer with when the team gets it's doors blown off. Or acts like a f'n idiot when people post a opinion on a opinion Board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having trouble understanding this as well. Matt Moore has proven that he can win with the starters. His teammates have a lot of faith in him and play hard for him. He is perfectly capable of managing this run-first offense. Most importantly, he won't turn the ball over five times in a game. There must be something going on behind the scenes that we don't know about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
    • If hypothetically, Ickey comes fully healthy, would he be willing to give up left tackle money for left guard money? In the Panthers case, moving Ickey LG or RT would be in our best interest and as it gives us our best starting offensive lineman combination. However, Im sure there's another team that would be desperate and willing to dish out top dollars for Ickey to have him come play left tackle for them. In that case, Ickey would just leave for that team instead.
×
×
  • Create New...