Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Broncos Fans Are Saying

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

heelinfine Newbie

heelinfine

Posted
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, tarheels said:

said the guys a fan of the team in the always bad nfc south,that played teams in the nfc east and afc south which were all bad teams and the bulk of Panthers schedule.

the records and rankings of all Denvers opponents were generally higher.

beating Brady is a hell of a lot harder then beating Carson

Tell that to the Eagles. They beat Brady and got their asses handed to them by the Cards. 

I hope the Broncos players are using beating a statue like Brady behind a swiss cheese o line as "proof" they're are going to do the same to Cam and the Panthers. 

If BB would have kicked just one field goal instead of going for it the Broncos would be at home. They squeaked by 20-18. The Panthers throttled the Cards 49-15. But hey keep telling yourself what you need to, to convince yourself the Panthers are going to be easier than the Pats victory.

Edited by heelinfine
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diehardpanther02 Newbie

Diehardpanther02

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, CatMan72 said:

That pass rush won't help when we're running the ball down their throat, can anyone name their ILB's? I know I can't and I'm an NFL junkie. They'll have to pull the safeties down into the box for run support and you know what happens next...

Trevathan and Marshall I believe.  Both are pretty decent LBS but they don't match up well agains our style of play.  They are fast and can cover fairly well but are far and away anywhere near the level of our LBS, but who is?  Their defense is very stout but I do think they will have to bring a safety down in run support. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarheels Newbie

tarheels

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, heelinfine said:

Tell that to the Eagles. They beat Brady and got their asses handed to them by the Cards. 

I hope the Broncos players are using beating a statue like Brady behind a swiss cheese o line as "proof" they're are going to do the same to Cam and thr Panthers. 

If BB would have kicked just one field goal instead of going for it the Broncos would be at home. They squeaked by 20-18. The Panthers throttled the Cards 49-15. But hey keep telling yourself what you need to, to convince yourself the Panthers are going to be easier tgan the Pats victorym

its already been discussed that teams that  lead the league in first half scoring,dont win super bowls.

it means nothing for this game.

did they squeak by or was it two better teams battling?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
heelinfine Newbie

heelinfine

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, tarheels said:

its already been discussed that teams that  lead the league in first half scoring,dont win super bowls.

it means nothing for this game.

did they squeak by or was it two better teams battling?

 

No. Quite frankly I fully believe the Panthers is better than the Broncos and the Pats.

Edited by heelinfine
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, tarheels said:

its already been discussed that teams that  lead the league in first half scoring,dont win super bowls.

it means nothing for this game.

did they squeak by or was it two better teams battling?

 

You guys make Saints fans look like Mensa members.  You in particular are 1 IQ point above sitting in the corner drooling all over yourself.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCCNASTY Newbie

MCCNASTY

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, colty77 said:

Broncos have had national exposure all year and for several years.  They usually get the nationally televised late afternoon game with the #1 CBS crew Nantz and Simms, if they're not playing on Sunday or Monday Night...  they've had numerous Super Bowl appearances and countless playoff runs.  This is new for the Panthers and their fans, the excitement and all.  It's old hat to the Broncos, the coaches and their old QB.

I'd like to see the Panthers face this game with realistic expectations...   not over-hyping their chances only to be left with their expectations dashed by halftime and spend the second half in a cold sweat panic.

 

 

Actually our expectations are much more realistic then yours. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KushMcDieselson Explorer

KushMcDieselson

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, tarheels said:

said the guys a fan of the team in the always bad nfc south,that played teams in the nfc east and afc south which were all bad teams and the bulk of Panthers schedule.

the records and rankings of all Denvers opponents were generally higher.

beating Brady is a hell of a lot harder then beating Carson

What in the actual fug are you even doing on this forum? Your handle is tarheels, your avatar is a panther player, yet in a week's time you've done nothing but talk down the Panthers?

You are obviously a troll fan from some poor team watching SB50 from their couches, my guess is some scrub ass AFC team since when you're not trashing the Panthers you're trashing the NFC (like the AFC East/South/West hasn't been hot garbage for basically the past 14 years, with 3 good teams and 9 others always fighting for 2nd place in their division.)

Talk about us only making it to the Superbowl because we played the AFCS and NFCE, check Manning's glorious 2013 year and the last time he went to the Superbowl and that's the same divisions he played that year.  

2013 Manning and the offense sent them to the Superbowl and then fizzled out while the defense did nothing to help. 2015 Manning let his defense and the backup qb carry them to the Superbowl, because he sure as fug did nothing to get them there.

The biggest difference between us and the 2013 Broncos that feasted on the NFCE and AFCS? We feasted on both sides of the ball, and our whole team took us to SB50.

And before you talk about second half stats, you should realize that stats belong on paper, the game is played on the field. Had you watched any of our games this year, you would realize the only reason any of those teams made any sort of progress in the second half, was because the coaching staff always switched to the conservative, grind the clock and play not to lose game plan. Thankfully, we  abandoned that after our first playoff game when we allowed Seattle to score way too many points in our conservative game plan. It was OK during the regular season, but understanding every game could be the last in January and keeping the foot on the gas during the second half was a must......and you see how that ended for the Cardinals.

I fully expect them to be full throttle for 60 minutes on Sunday and fug the respect for the Sheriff, I hope they drop at least 50 in SB50.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...