Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell: Carolina isn't a good matchup for Denver


pantherking15

Recommended Posts

Bill Barnwell wrote a comprehensive article looking at all the various mismatches between the Panthers and the Broncos.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14705931/denver-best-defense-football-facing-attack-yet-face-nfl

Quote

Von Miller and DeMarcus Ware spent the AFC Championship Game terrorizingTom Brady and the New England Patriots. They combined for three sacks and 11 of Denver's 20 quarterback knockdowns, a season high for any defense in any one game this year. It was a perfect storm of opportunity in a wildly favorable matchup: The Broncos needed to get pressure with as few players as possibleand had a pair of star edge rushers matched up against tackles Sebastian Vollmer and Marcus Cannon, who offered precious little resistance.

Super Bowl 50 would seem to present a similar opportunity. Michael Oher andMike Remmers have greatly exceeded expectations as Carolina's starting tackle combination this season, but on paper, they shouldn't be anything resembling a match for Denver's star duo. But it's not that simple. The Panthers make it as difficult for edge rushers to impact games as any team in football by virtue of their imaginative, devastating rushing attack. It's not that the Panthers can't block Miller and Ware; it's that they may not need to whatsoever. 

 

Quote

All of this is even before getting to the running plays that don't involve Newton whatsoever. Shula is equally creative with those concepts. Sure, the Panthers will run inside and outside zone, power, counter and trap plays. Versatility in personnel and in blockers allows the Panthers to overwhelm defenses conceptually. They'll fire in the motion for a jet sweep two or three times in a possession, never hand it off to the wide receiver, and come back to it later in the game. Shula will dial up a running play that mirrors the blocking from an earlier play before twisting it in a totally different direction as you over-pursue. Carolina screws with your run fits, stretches you horizontally and then gashes you vertically.

What this all does is paralyze the front seven of the opposing defense. Watch tape of the Panthers this season and you'll see edge rushers who seem to freeze every time Carolina is in the shotgun, trying to tiptoe in three directions at once as they follow the various fakes and motion en route to actually locating the football. When they get too aggressive, the Panthers have enough discipline and ballhandling ability to run into vacated lanes. And when the defense gets too conservative and waits to read and react, Carolina is too quick and plows forward for chunks of yardage.

 

Quote

The truth is that the Broncos aren't an especially great fit for this Panthers offense. You'd want a defense who can stand up in short-yardage situations, and the Broncos are the second worst short-yardage run defense in the league, ahead of only Carolina. (Remember that when the camera pans over to Riverboat Ron before a fourth-and-short.) If you wanted to construct a defense that was designed to stop Carolina, you'd want penetrating interior linemen who could blow up plays in the backfield, rangy inside linebackers who could run with Newton and tight end Greg Olsen, and safeties who weren't going to get burned deep.

That isn't Denver.

 

Quote

The strength of schedule argument also looks to be flipped on its head. The Panthers have faced a pair of top-five defenses in the Seahawks and Cardinals during the postseason and come away looking awful impressive. The far more obvious mismatch is the second-ranked Panthers defense against a Broncos offense that ranks just 25th in DVOA. To overcome that, the Broncos will need to hope for a different sort of game altogether.

Barnwell also goes into detail about the mismatch between the Panthers defense vs the Broncos offense. The Broncos have the 23rd ranked pass protection and 21st ranked run blocking (per PFF). Basically, our DTs have the potential to dominate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally someone speaking the truth, although I think quietly all analysts know the Panthers are going to destroy the Broncos, they need to make it appear that it'll be a close game so that people will at least watch until the halftime show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Finally someone speaking the truth, although I think quietly all analysts know the Panthers are going to destroy the Broncos, they need to make it appear that it'll be a close game so that people will at least watch until the halftime show.

Basically, the people who actually know football (Greg Cosell, Brian Billick, Bill Barnwell, etc.) are telling it like it is. The "analysts" and former players on ESPN, NFL Network, etc. are repeating the same uninformed/misleading talking points to generate hype, which is understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez, this is an excellent article.

Quote

. Sure, the Panthers will run inside and outside zone, power, counter and trap plays. Versatility in personnel and in blockers allows the Panthers to overwhelm defenses conceptually. They'll fire in the motion for a jet sweep two or three times in a possession, never hand it off to the wide receiver, and come back to it later in the game. Shula will dial up a running play that mirrors the blocking from an earlier play before twisting it in a totally different direction as you over-pursue. Carolina screws with your run fits, stretches you horizontally and then gashes you vertically.

 

 

No lie, I was fuggin up people in Madden '13 doing these same things. I'm glad Shula has finally caught up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherking15 said:

Basically, the people who actually know football (Greg Cosell, Brian Billick, Bill Barnwell, etc.) are telling it like it is. The "analysts" and former players on ESPN, NFL Network, etc. are repeating the same uninformed/misleading talking points to generate hype, which is understandable.

Yea, you gotta know that those ESPN and NFL Network guys are given scripts to read and storylines to plug.  They need to generate hype like you said.  If this game is even close, I'd be surprised.  The Broncos were probably the best matchup from the AFC they could have hoped for honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

If you wanted to construct a defense that was designed to stop Carolina, you'd want penetrating interior linemen who could blow up plays in the backfield, rangy inside linebackers who could run with Newton and tight end Greg Olsen, and safeties who weren't going to get burned deep.

Haha, this is the Panthers defense. The Panthers offense gets to practice vs the perfect defense designed to stop them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great article, the real football people know how ugly this could get for the Broncos. 

I've been telling anyone that would listen how favorable this matchup is for us. That doesn't guarantee a win, but the Broncos will have to play the game of their lives while we just have to play the way we've been playing all season to secure the win. 

Everyone is focused on our offense vs. their defense, nobody is talking about our defense vs. their offense and that's the matchup that is most likely to decide this game (in our favor).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...