Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quality vs Content

shinner

By shinner,
in Huddle Lounge

Without hesitation, I would  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Without hesitation, I would

    • Local SD: I needs my announcers
      4
    • HD: why is this even a question?
      14

Recommended Posts

shinner Newbie

shinner

Posted
Posted

Ok, you're getting ready to watch your game...you bring up the onscreen guide and see it's available on 2 stations. The first is in HD but it's the other teams broadcast. The second is your teams broadcast but it's in SD.

Which one do you watch? Do you go for the superior picture of the opponent's HD feed or Is the idea of not being able to hear your home team's announcers enough to make you suffer with a horrible SD picture?

(btw - in this scenario you also don't have the option of listening to the local audio via am, fm, internet or other audio device.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shinner Newbie

shinner

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Rosinski - I'll take SD and close my eyes a lot of the time.

Mixon - I'd listen to another team unless it was Atlanta.

This was my wife's choice last night. Braves broadcast in SD, Mets in HD. I would suffer through the Mets broadcast but she watched the SD Braves team. Luckily I never am put in that spot with Red Sox/Yankees because if it's on YES, it's on NESN...and NESN has one of the best HD pictures I've seen.

weird scenario IMO. I have the choice of HD and SD, but both are the same other than picture quality. announcers, commercials, everything

Not weird at all for me....if we were talking about a "local" team, I probably would have the choice of HD or SD by the local network....but that isn't the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Apprentice

Kettle

Posted
Posted

Being new to the HD world I would probably go for the HD for the majority of the game switching over to the SD for replays of a really great play by my team.

I always check my HD channels for something to watch before checking the SD, and have been that way ever since I got it hooked up.

My wife can't tell the diff between SD and HD... I think the vagina affects the brain.

mine WAS the same way. she would DVR or watch stuff on the SD stations when it was on the HD station. I finally made her sit down, and look at the difference as I went back and forth from channel 9(fox SD) to 920(fox HD) several times. I had to do it during something she was interested in for her to really see it. Now she never makes the mistake of recording the SD if HD is available. Discovery and NatGeo are also great channels for doing this same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

mine WAS the same way. she would DVR or watch stuff on the SD stations when it was on the HD station. I finally made her sit down, and look at the difference as I went back and forth from channel 9(fox SD) to 920(fox HD) several times. I had to do it during something she was interested in for her to really see it. Now she never makes the mistake of recording the SD if HD is available. Discovery and NatGeo are also great channels for doing this same thing.

:lol:

I haven't bothered to try and explain it to mine... she also records everything in SD which is fine with me because it takes a lot less space on the DVR and leaves more for me to use. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

Not sure which is worse...

I got home yesterday and found my wife comparing two custom calibration setting trying to decide if the magenta setting in one was better than the other.

Your situation is way worse... mine has no inclination to do anything like that... and I'm glad she doesn't, the TV would be screwed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Flux

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Aussie Tank
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • Jackie Lee
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...