Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

matt moore

speedy233

By speedy233,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

I just can't believe the team is considering Feeley as the No. 2 quarterback. I realize that the coaches see a lot more of these guys than we do, but Moore looked good in his rookie year. He's had time to learn the playbook and the offense, and in my opinion he looked better than McCown in the preseason.

If we have to go to someone other than Delhomme, it might as well be Moore. We've kept him in the roster for three years -- it's time to find out if he has any shot as Jake's heir apparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

I just can't believe the team is considering Feeley as the No. 2 quarterback. I realize that the coaches see a lot more of these guys than we do, but Moore looked good in his rookie year. He's had time to learn the playbook and the offense, and in my opinion he looked better than McCown in the preseason.

If we have to go to someone other than Delhomme, it might as well be Moore. We've kept him in the roster for three years -- it's time to find out if he has any shot as Jake's heir apparent.

Dont worry, this might be the end of Fox

Jake gonna falter, they put in Feely who wont do much better, and by time they get to Moore... its too late

Bye Bye Foxy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

i think theres a little more to it then just choosing Moore over Fox.

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball downfield, but the changeup this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Veteran

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball down field, but the change up this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Fox prefers veterans over rookies and sometimes he hurts the team doing that look at Foster/Williams deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Badbak Newbie

Badbak

Posted
Posted

"if they don't play Moore, Fox will be gone" sounds close enough.

Moore has a lot of talent. He couldn't freaking beat out McCown and he's not efficient. It's great he's got arm and gets the ball downfield, but the changeup this team needs has veteran experience and can be efficient. I can completely see this team wanting a conservative guy instead of a younger Delhomme to relieve Delhomme. That's not something you fire a guy over.

Well why keep Moore on the team? Why not fill the #2 and #3 slots with a couple of old "has beens"and "clipboard holders"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...