Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk about safeties


davos

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, davos said:

This guy is just sooo stellar against the run.  If we're looking at safeties, I'd covet him over Cravens.  ACC DPOtY for a reason. 

The last ACC DPOTY we drafted seems to working out pretty good. I can hear it now...CAAAAAAASH!

Plus we should be able to snag this guy in the 3rd or fourth round and still address DE, CB, TE, WR, RB, Dt, yadayadayada in rounds 1 & 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask Bryan addressed safeties last night. First we get the typical "the answer is on the roster", then he mentions Karl Joseph as a possible # 30. go figure! We do have Boston, Robinson and Marlowe chomping at the bit for playing time. As poorly as G-man's last "the answer is on the roster" went (Bell), I see us targeting a safety, though later in the draft.

http://www.panthers.com/news/ask-bryan/article-2/Ask-Bryan-With-the-30th-pick/1ab6dadc-60c2-467c-a0b6-85a6689dce22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Didn't like Cole's play at strong safety last year? 

 

Like I mentioned earlier, if you can find a guy that can play both the run and the pass well, diagnose plays quickly, and line up in the box, that's your SS.  I just feel Coleman's more naturally a tweener/FS and younger guys tend to move into the SS role.  It's better to have someone with seasoned ball skills at FS like Coleman who knows how to keep the opposition in front of him.  Many will say there's not much difference between the two spots these days but I disagree.  Coleman can be a liability in the run game if a RB gets to the second level and you don't want that with a box safety.  We also have learned our coaches like guys strong against the run and it's why I think Cash or Thompson would be very solid choices.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...