Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Practice Squad Change


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

The previous 2-player limit was part of a 2-year experiment, so I wasn't sure if there would be any exceptions this year as that provision had expired. Instead, they've doubled it. 

Could be an interesting development relating to the receiver battle. Hill and Bersin each spent time on the practice squad these last two years as a result of this exception. Of the 14 receivers on the roster, only Ginn and Hill don't qualify for the practice squad under this provision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jdpanther5 said:

The previous 2-player limit was part of a 2-year experiment, so I wasn't sure if there would be any exceptions this year as that provision had expired. Instead, they've doubled it. 

Could be an interesting development relating to the receiver battle. Hill and Bersin each spent time on the practice squad these last two years as a result of this exception. Of the 14 receivers on the roster, only Ginn and Hill don't qualify for the practice squad under this provision.

I still don't see how Berse can be PS eligible after all this time, but I am sure you understand the convoluted rules more than me. I guess that "accrued seasons" means 16 total games or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I still don't see how Berse can be PS eligible after all this time, but I am sure you understand the convoluted rules more than me. I guess that "accrued seasons" means 16 total games or something.

Six games to equal an accrued season, and players qualify for the exception if they have no more than two accrued seasons. While we're going on year 5 with Bersin in camp, the first two years he didn't make the team. So only two accrued seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jdpanther5 said:

Six games to equal an accrued season, and players qualify for the exception if they have no more than two accrued seasons. While we're going on year 5 with Bersin in camp, the first two years he didn't make the team. So only two accrued seasons.

Isn't there a limit of 2 years that a player can be on the practice squad? Bersin's first 2 years here were practice squad, so I don't think he can do practice squad a 3rd year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, O-Ther said:

Isn't there a limit of 2 years that a player can be on the practice squad? Bersin's first 2 years here were practice squad, so I don't think he can do practice squad a 3rd year

Players are eligible for a third year if their team "never has less than 53 players on the active roster."

Either way, Bersin was just cut his first year and then played in the CFL or something. Only one full practice squad season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...