Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Creamy or Crunchy Peanut Butter?


The Huddler

Creamy or Crunchy Peanut Butter?  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Creamy or Crunchy?

    • Creamy
      34
    • Crunchy
      33


Recommended Posts

I can't believe we've had five pages and no one has mentioned the fact that it's irritating as hell to make a sandwich with peanut butter with uncrushed peanuts in it. It tears your bread to hell, making something more akin to a hotdog with chili, slaw and all the fixings where the bun breaks at the bottom, leaving a mini culinary disaster where you're trying to salvage some form of decorum and etiquette as you shovel the morphed concoction into your mouth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2016 at 1:43 PM, CRA said:

We talking sandwich?  B/c there is only one answer.  Crunchy.

If you disagree you can take your non-sweet tea drinking, smooth peanut better eating, yankee smelling self back north!

Uh, about that sweet tea...

http://abc11.com/health/doctors-sweet-tea-linked-to-kidney-stones/1409959/

Not that it's going to change my drinking habits, particularly on the occasional visit to Bojangles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, one more thing, crunchy peanut butter on my celery, carrots, and bananas is kinda weird.

And let's not talk about the crumbled disaster that results from trying to spread crunchy peanut butter on my Ritz or saltine cracker.

Creamy is crunchy's evolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MountainHeel66 said:

Really.... No one is going to comment on this.. The Huddle has really let me down today.

I thought the same thing after proof reading what I typed figured I would leave it too see what happened. Kinda disappointed. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rags lost again. All is right in the hockey world. 
    • He’s responsible for two drafts classes. The first was one of the worst drafts I’ve ever seem. The second one is showing a ton of promise. I’m somewhere between skeptical and hopeful on Morgan. 
    • I'm a big fan of Dan. His ability to find productive players deep in the draft will pay off.  I'm going to give him 1.5 draft classes right now, because I do think it's a little unfair to evaluate his first year when he got the job in January, especially when we went into that draft not having a first round pick.  XL and Brooks are still big time TBD players. Both still have incredibly high ceilings, but both have also given us legitimate reasons to have a lot of pause. Trevin Wallace, Chau Smith Wade and Jatavion Sanders have IMO outplayed their draft position early in their careers. That's a great thing. He also got Coker and Demani Richardson as UDFAs that year. Given the situation we were in, I really don't mind the gamble on the high ceiling guys. Still may work out, still may not, but if you made a checklist of ideal situation for an NFL GM to walk into, ours was near the bottom of that list.  Every single 2025 pick is contributing in some way. That typically doesn't happen. I am absolutely blown away by this draft class 6 games in. Even the best GM's miss on occasion, and we can't expect Dan to be 100% on drafts moving forward. Ryan Fitzgerald was an excellent find as well.  Comparing our last two drafts to the previous few is pretty shocking. Can you imagine this season without our Rookies? It would not be good. Additionally, this roster only has 6 players with more than 6 years of experience, and two of those are specialist.  The next step is equally important, and still very much TBD. We have to avoid Cap Chaos. 
×
×
  • Create New...