Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Godfrey a liability?


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

I meant to post this earlier, but I kind of forgot when he accidentally caused the fumble with his helmet. That motherf*cker SUCKS. Might be the worst starting safety in the league. Doesn't hit well, doesn't wrap up, blows coverages constantly in zone, he just SUCKS. Other than the fumble, he was a giant hole in the defense in tackling and coverage. I just don't understand why he's still out there. Give Martin a shot, he can't do any worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, I believe it is more scheme. Same can be said for Marshall and gamble, but the fact is they all are cover guys who are in a zone scheme and being misaligned. With scheme we are running its just not fair to judge anyone in pass coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, I believe it is more scheme. Same can be said for Marshall and gamble, but the fact is they all are cover guys who are in a zone scheme and being misaligned. With scheme we are running its just not fair to judge anyone in pass coverage.

Godfrey blows....he blew all last year also. Harris stinks in coverage and Marshall doesn't impress either. If you watched Marshall outside that one pick he was just plain sad. Gamble is alright but I put him in Lucas' category (even though they are clearly different sytle CBs) both are put in position to fail under Fox's schemes. Captain looks promising. As a unit, they look to be worse in Meek's version of Fox's defense than Trgo interpretation of Fox's D.........Fox is begging for teams to pick them apart with the soft play and weak pass rush.

Godfrey is horrible though....popping a ball out once means nothing in the grand scheme of thems in comparison to everything he doesn't/can't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...