Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

US Women's Soccer


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

So we lost in the quarterfinals, and it was the first time we have not reached the gold medal match in our women's team history.

Just a couple of observations though...

1) is it just me, or does hope solo really suck?  We get far more scoring opportunities on opponents that make their GKs work, whereas she only gets tested MAYBE a handful of times a game and makes stupid mistakes and/or always seems like she is about to give up a goal rather than save it.  She really gets on my nerves.

2) why did we move on from pia sundhagen (sp?)?  Why mess up a good thing?  Apparently, we are winless against her since she has moved on to sweden.

3) the team plays completely different without the finishing threat that abby wambach was.  Those corners and crosses into the box seem like complete "punts" now, for a lack of a better term.  She is missed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

So we lost in the quarterfinals, and it was the first time we have not reached the gold medal match in our women's team history.

Just a couple of observations though...

1) is it just me, or does hope solo really suck?  We get far more scoring opportunities on opponents that make their GKs work, whereas she only gets tested MAYBE a handful of times a game and makes stupid mistakes and/or always seems like she is about to give up a goal rather than save it.  She really gets on my nerves.

It's just you. 

2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

2) why did we move on from pia sundhagen (sp?)?  Why mess up a good thing?  Apparently, we are winless against her since she has moved on to sweden.

Because she lost. We won the World Cup without her. We just haven't figured out Sweden's bullsh*t defense-all-the-time strategy.

2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

3) the team plays completely different without the finishing threat that abby wambach was.  Those corners and crosses into the box seem like complete "punts" now, for a lack of a better term.  She is missed.

Disagree. The team is better without her. The problem today was Sweden was content to throw 9 people on their side at all times. It's a cynical, unfun strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...