Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This TE thing kind of bothers me


top dawg

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I wouldn't say screwed and I am down on Dickson but I am reminded of the great plays he made last season, specifically this one when Greg was out for a brief period during the ATL home game (I was at that game, what an incredible play to watch live and also very scary when Greg went down, the stadium was completely silent and it looked like Cam was having a panic attack watching Greg roll around on the ground)

image.gifSo I'm a little optimistic that if Dickson wins the #2 we will be ok with him. If Olsen goes down we're fuged anyway just like many other teams if they lost their top tight end. im not sure who we could pick up at this point that would be an upgrade, but it's something to watch going forward in later years in the draft. Maybe sandland becomes the answer eventually? Don't know or maybe we should draft a TE high.

That was a flash in the pan---great catch. Other than the catch off the tip, that's literally the only outstanding thing that I remember.

My thing is that Dickson graded out as a bottom feeder at the position last year, and if you look at his entire body of work throughout his career, it has been average at best. Lucas, of course playing against threes (maybe twos), just looks to me like he provides more of a spark route running and, more importantly, catching the ball. Surely he can't do any worse than Dickson does in blocking, right? Maybe? Sure I will be watching the wire, but the answer---at least for a marginal upgrade---may be on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, Greg could be the first TE in history to have B2B2B 1,000+ receiving yards.  Of course there's going to be a huge drop off in talent behind that.  Other guys are thinking too much, and aren't playing at the same speed as the rest of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OriginalPantherDan said:

This is all I remember of Ed Dickson last year. 

IMG_3183.MP4

image looks to be empty, but maybe that's the point. 

That will be true of any #2 TE on this team though. You're just not going to get many chances to catch passes in that position. Just for the record though, I'm pretty sure that wasn't Dickson's only TD catch. I'm too lazy to look it up right now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

Maybe sandland becomes the answer eventually? Don't know or maybe we should draft a TE high.

I think if rumors are true, we were very interested in Hunter Henry.  But Vernon was higher on our draft board.  I do think Gettleman is thinking about TE and planning to strengthen our depth behind Greg.  It may take some time for Sandland, Simonson, Deaver or Mucas to really contribute, though I think SImonson is ready to make some plays given that he was in for a fair amount of snaps the 2nd half of last season...

I remember hearing that 2017 is going to be an excellent class for TEs.  I do think we need a backup for the "what if Greg's iron man streak ends" scenario.  I think it's on G'man's mind, just as the "what if KB goes down" scenario led him to draft Funchess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

And the minuscule hope about Deaver comes to an end. Minus Wofford, perhaps he'll be the next practice squad hometown warrior, and join/replace Bersin.

 

You're forgetting a few other possible hometown favorites:  Byrd and Scoot Simmons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

You're forgetting a few other possible hometown favorites:  Byrd and Scoot Simmons. 

Didn't forget. They just haven't gotten the ax yet.

For what it's worth, I think that the cutting of Hill is but another indicator that Byrd will likely make the 53. He's the only other hopeful at the position with serious speed.

Is Byrd a local?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...