Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq


The Lobo

Recommended Posts

Will we see more of this kid Sunday? I feel like there is a good chance due to Gabberts mobility. I know Shaq is used situationally, but the kid is good. Why not have him at there with TD and Luke a majority of the game? He can cover the slot guy (see NFCCG for an example) so it's not like he can't cover. He is solid in run support so why not play him more? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

he's a stud, but if we are running a defense that is baiting the pass, then he is going to sit.  i agree with OPs sentiment though.  

i'd like to see us get up so big the niners are forced to play kaep and then go tear his ass in half.  

He's solid in the pass game though. He was a big reason Fitz did jack poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The niners offense is a perfect offense for shaq to play increased minutes. He can cover the slot on the short quick routes and will be a perfect spy for Gabbert not to mention his blitz ability. 

I will be really disappointed if he is not on the field for a large part of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Will we see more of this kid Sunday? I feel like there is a good chance due to Gabberts mobility. I know Shaq is used situationally, but the kid is good. Why not have him at there with TD and Luke a majority of the game? He can cover the slot guy (see NFCCG for an example) so it's not like he can't cover. He is solid in run support so why not play him more? 

 

 

more cover 3 defense, Shaqs ability to play the run and pass will help make the 49rs  1 dimensional. No gashed runs this time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

i haven't looked at that game in depth, but i agree with you that shaq can cover.   i have my doubts that he was ever the reason fitz didn't do poo though.  that was a whole D effort.  

For sure I was exaggerating for the sake of the topic, but Shaq played great against Fitz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

i haven't looked at that game in depth, but i agree with you that shaq can cover.   i have my doubts that he was ever the reason fitz didn't do poo though.  that was a whole D effort.  

Shaq jammed fitz at the line like no one else has been able to do.  Also Shaq negated Fitz in run blocking as well.  Fitz could not block Shaq to spring any runs to the outside.

Shaq was the reason Larry did nothing in that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Shaq jammed fitz at the line like no one else has been able to do.  Also Shaq negated Fitz in run blocking as well.  Fitz could not block Shaq to spring any runs to the outside.

Shaq was the reason Larry did nothing in that game.

I love you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, L-TownCat said:

 

 

2 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Shaq jammed fitz at the line like no one else has been able to do.  Also Shaq negated Fitz in run blocking as well.  Fitz could not block Shaq to spring any runs to the outside.

Shaq was the reason Larry did nothing in that game.

alright my man.  shaq did all that.  i done said i haven't broken down the game, but if our strong side LB did that to one of the best wideouts in the game, then what the fug is the question about then?   shaq don't ever need to leave in any dime or nickel. you win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

 

alright my man.  shaq did all that.  i done said i haven't broken down the game, but if our strong side LB did that to one of the best wideouts in the game, then what the fug is the question about then?   shaq don't ever need to leave in any dime or nickel. you win.  

Question was if he would play more. I was hoping for other huddlers opinions and you have shared yours, thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...