Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chargers to LA per Schefter


Nails

Recommended Posts

Kevin Seifert NFL Nation 

seifert_kevin_m.jpg&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

The Chargers became a rare NFL franchise that no one wanted. San Diego leaders and citizens made clear they wouldn't pay (enough) for a new stadium. And a year after the Rams moved to Los Angeles, no one there was clamoring for a second team. The better economic deal between the two imperfect options is LA. The Chargers are a business and apparently will act like one. Per Adam Schefter, they will move to Los Angeles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alden Gonzalez ESPN Staff Writer 

gonzalez_alden_m.jpg&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

The Chargers are expected to announce as early as Thursday that they plan to leave San Diego for Los Angeles in 2017, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter. I spoke with Rams COO Kevin Demoff about the possibility of a second team in the market a couple weeks ago. Here's part of what he said: "If we do our job correctly, a second team should only heighten the NFL excitement in the marketplace and build on it. I don't think it takes away. I think it just enhances it. But it's still dependent on -- you have to be playing winning football, you have to be exciting, you have to make your brand entertaining and relevant. I think that's true whether you're the only team in the market or whether there are two or three teams in the market."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not suggesting that tanking is the right thing to do every time. I do think that if you have guys like Burns and Moore that you will trade anyway, then you should think about tanking and getting max value, especially if you want to grab a QB that might go 1st overall. We tried to do both. Trade CMC for picks but don’t take 3 1sts and a 2nd for Burns and Moore. Instead, we won a few games and then threw in Moore on a trade because we didn’t tank and we gave Burns away for a 2nd. Can you honestly say that fully tanking, by trading away all our best guys who weren’t in future plans, in 2022 wouldn’t have made our team better now? We wanted a rookie QB and we didn’t extend the main guy we didn’t want to trade. We were 100% in full tear down and we could have been a playoff team last year if we used the 4 extra 1sts or 3 1sts and 2 2nds (counting picks saved on Young by being pick 3 or 4 not 9) on D. Culture building is funny. It took three coaching changes to seemingly get there. Morgan and Canales weren’t in charge when we “protected” our culture. We still traded Burns and Moore, we just lost 3 first round picks in the process. Also, do you think the Eagles are in a bad place because of their coach clearly tanking a game for a draft pick? Remember that? It was obvious and the coach was fired. The funny thing is that this is something teams do all the time but they add their stars (like Cam in 2016, CMC, Burns, etc.) to IR or rest them in week 16/17. Pederson was just dumb and made it obvious. He could have just sat his starters to start. Anyway, did that incident tank risk their credibility? Did Barkley decide to not sign with them? Seems like their SB win and other SB visit say they are just fine. Winning makes culture, picking the right coach makes culture, trading away guys who are on other teams in a year for top picks and keeping more picks by having a better starting pick to trade up, does not impact culture. If it helps you win, culture will be fine, ask the Eagles.
×
×
  • Create New...