Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Matty Meltdown - Failcons VS Seachickens Thread


Saca312

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

fug ATL - Matty Ice - the GA Dome - "Rise Up" - Samuel L Jackson - that dude that hit Cam in the head - Mike Vick - Home Depot. 

All of it....

Don't forget pumped in crowd noise, chickfila, coca cola, Arthur blank, and that new sphincter arena he's building

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Sorry, I think it's Atlanta's year. Quinn knows how to dismantle his old team, Matt Ryan has the ability to do it.

Seattle's more dinged up and they don't have the 12th Man with them. Could be a long day for the Seahawks.

You shut your filthy mouth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

fug ATL - Matty Ice - the GA Dome - "Rise Up" - Samuel L Jackson - that dude that hit Cam in the head - Mike Vick - Home Depot - fake crowd noise - Chick Fil-A - new butt Dome. 

All of it....

Hey hey, I was with you until Chick Fil A. Let's not act irrationally now. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...