Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl 43 Teams Both 1-2


Montsta

Recommended Posts

He's just saying that we're still in position to have a successful season at 1-2, as other teams have proven. It's not that hard to understand.

Thank you.

My point was it doesn't matter what anybody did last year.

I understand your point. I'm simply saying a lot of people thought that Pittsburgh had a shot at repeating, and that Arizona would be a contender. I don't think their fan bases are panicking quite that much yet.

I think to open the season with 2 straight losses is of course a bad thing. But if we can win MNF, tak a week off, and then play a WASH team that looks BBBAAADDD to me, then we can start taking a collective deep breath and calming down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To expand a little:

Super Bowl Champions: Steelers (1-2)

Super Bowl Runner Up: Cardinals (1-2)

Championship Opponents:

- Ravens (3-0)

- Eagles (2-1)

Divisional Opponents:

- Chargers (2-1)

- Giants (3-0)

- Titans (0-3)

- Panthers (0-2)

(apparently it was better to play the Sunday game last year)

Wild Cards:

- Vikings (3-0)

- Dolphins (0-3)

- Colts (3-0)

- Falcons (2-1)

Three of last year's twelve playoff teams have yet to win a game, while two more - the Super Bowl teams -have only a single win to their credit.

Interesting :sosp:

Not especially meaningful, but interesting :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm simply saying a lot of people thought that Pittsburgh had a shot at repeating, and that Arizona would be a contender. I don't think their fan bases are panicking quite that much yet.

I think to open the season with 2 straight losses is of course a bad thing. But if we can win MNF, tak a week off, and then play a WASH team that looks BBBAAADDD to me, then we can start taking a collective deep breath and calming down.

It's a valid point, and a legit possibility.

As as aside, there's a devilish little part of my brain that would looove to see what would happen to the Cowboy fanbase if they lose their second straight game in the Ego Dome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To expand a little:

Super Bowl Champions: Steelers (1-2)

Super Bowl Runner Up: Cardinals (1-2)...

...Three of last year's twelve playoff teams have yet to win a game, while two more - the Super Bowl teams -have only a single win to their credit.

Interesting :sosp:

Not especially meaningful, but interesting :lol:

It is interesting. I know last year is last year in the NFL, but players and coaches and all NFL eople will tell you how anyone can beat anyone on any given Sunday. If my math is correct, we are not mathematically eliminated from having a 14-2 season yet. Doesn't matter if the wins come during the beginning, middle, or end of the season.

I know I'm usually overly optimistic, but the panic button is out of control in here lately. Maybe I'm wrong and our team truly is shitty, but that's what they go out and play the games for.

If someone told you in January of last season that in week 3 of the 2009 season the Titans, Dolphins, Panthers, Steelers and Cardinals would have 2 combined wins, they'd probably say you're crazy.

Carolina 27 - Dallas 20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one's. I just call it like I see it. And from what I see, you like basking in negativity here. As a Saints fan, you may be accustomed to giving up after week 2. Once we're 4 out of the division lead, I might begin to worry. I guess I'm just your typical, delusional fan.

Don't mind SaintJ. He's soaking up the Saints good fortunes while he can, because he knows it won't last too long. I actually heard that they think that thing on Drew Brees' face is malignant and spreading. Bummer. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was making a valid point, leave it up to some homerish baby to make this a smack thread.

I was making a joke about Drew's facial growth. Don't take it personally. It was just divisional banter. Unless it really is cancerous. Then I'll feel bad.

In January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...