Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl 43 Teams Both 1-2

Montsta

By Montsta,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

He's just saying that we're still in position to have a successful season at 1-2, as other teams have proven. It's not that hard to understand.

Thank you.

My point was it doesn't matter what anybody did last year.

I understand your point. I'm simply saying a lot of people thought that Pittsburgh had a shot at repeating, and that Arizona would be a contender. I don't think their fan bases are panicking quite that much yet.

I think to open the season with 2 straight losses is of course a bad thing. But if we can win MNF, tak a week off, and then play a WASH team that looks BBBAAADDD to me, then we can start taking a collective deep breath and calming down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

To expand a little:

Super Bowl Champions: Steelers (1-2)

Super Bowl Runner Up: Cardinals (1-2)

Championship Opponents:

- Ravens (3-0)

- Eagles (2-1)

Divisional Opponents:

- Chargers (2-1)

- Giants (3-0)

- Titans (0-3)

- Panthers (0-2)

(apparently it was better to play the Sunday game last year)

Wild Cards:

- Vikings (3-0)

- Dolphins (0-3)

- Colts (3-0)

- Falcons (2-1)

Three of last year's twelve playoff teams have yet to win a game, while two more - the Super Bowl teams -have only a single win to their credit.

Interesting :sosp:

Not especially meaningful, but interesting :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I'm simply saying a lot of people thought that Pittsburgh had a shot at repeating, and that Arizona would be a contender. I don't think their fan bases are panicking quite that much yet.

I think to open the season with 2 straight losses is of course a bad thing. But if we can win MNF, tak a week off, and then play a WASH team that looks BBBAAADDD to me, then we can start taking a collective deep breath and calming down.

It's a valid point, and a legit possibility.

As as aside, there's a devilish little part of my brain that would looove to see what would happen to the Cowboy fanbase if they lose their second straight game in the Ego Dome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

To expand a little:

Super Bowl Champions: Steelers (1-2)

Super Bowl Runner Up: Cardinals (1-2)...

...Three of last year's twelve playoff teams have yet to win a game, while two more - the Super Bowl teams -have only a single win to their credit.

Interesting :sosp:

Not especially meaningful, but interesting :lol:

It is interesting. I know last year is last year in the NFL, but players and coaches and all NFL eople will tell you how anyone can beat anyone on any given Sunday. If my math is correct, we are not mathematically eliminated from having a 14-2 season yet. Doesn't matter if the wins come during the beginning, middle, or end of the season.

I know I'm usually overly optimistic, but the panic button is out of control in here lately. Maybe I'm wrong and our team truly is shitty, but that's what they go out and play the games for.

If someone told you in January of last season that in week 3 of the 2009 season the Titans, Dolphins, Panthers, Steelers and Cardinals would have 2 combined wins, they'd probably say you're crazy.

Carolina 27 - Dallas 20

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No one's. I just call it like I see it. And from what I see, you like basking in negativity here. As a Saints fan, you may be accustomed to giving up after week 2. Once we're 4 out of the division lead, I might begin to worry. I guess I'm just your typical, delusional fan.

Don't mind SaintJ. He's soaking up the Saints good fortunes while he can, because he knows it won't last too long. I actually heard that they think that thing on Drew Brees' face is malignant and spreading. Bummer. :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I was making a valid point, leave it up to some homerish baby to make this a smack thread.

I was making a joke about Drew's facial growth. Don't take it personally. It was just divisional banter. Unless it really is cancerous. Then I'll feel bad.

In January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...