Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gman: ...we're going to attack the issue [of LT]


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I believe Dave has already moved on form Oher.

The only way to reverse is if oher(in GREAT shape) has a face-to-face with Dave and sells him he's 100% committed to panther football. 

I know most here don't care about PS players, but for the last few weeks of the season the panthers carried 3 LTs out of 10 on the squad. That's a unusual high number and all signed future deals. If Tryus Thompson gets his act together, he can be a ok answer to LT. Be like old times with Williams at RT and Thompson at LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MV%doe said:

I believe Dave has already moved on form Oher.

The only way to reverse is if oher(in GREAT shape) has a face-to-face with Dave and sells him he's 100% committed to panther football. 

I know most here don't care about PS players, but for the last few weeks of the season the panthers carried 3 LTs out of 10 on the squad. That's a unusual high number and all signed future deals. If Tryus Thompson gets his act together, he can be a ok answer to LT. Be like old times with Williams at RT and Thompson at LT.

Love having Thompson as a project, but that's what he is.  5 teams in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Nails said:

Love having Thompson as a project, but that's what he is.  5 teams in 2 years.

Sounds fimilar......I know people bag on remmers hard, cause .......well I truly don't know why. He trys hard and is a good RT, decent LT(judging he got better), and great utility OLmen. Not getting hopes up, but maybe history repeats itself. Having old friend Williams (believe he's his godfather too)around and Williams knowing the environment & coaching staff, it could help his chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MV%doe said:

Sounds fimilar......I know people bag on remmers hard, cause .......well I truly don't know why. He trys hard and is a good RT, decent LT(judging he got better), and great utility OLmen. Not getting hopes up, but maybe history repeats itself. Having old friend Williams (believe he's his godfather too)around and Williams knowing the environment & coaching staff, it could help his chances.

I don't bag on Remmers. I agree, he works hard and gives it his all. He's simply not a starting caliber NFL OT. That's not his fault, that's the Panthers' fault for trying to cheapskate at OT.

giphy.gif

Miller-vs-Remmers.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't bag on Remmers. I agree, he works hard and gives it his all. He's simply not a starting caliber NFL OT. That's not his fault, that's the Panthers' fault for trying to cheapskate at OT.

giphy.gif

Miller-vs-Remmers.gif

 

 

Come on LG, you're smarter than to base your opinion off a couple bad plays. (I partly blame Shula for not helping him in the SB) You do also know remmers went to OTas, TC and the first few weeks of season as RT. Then one day he woke up and was the LT. Yes sir the start was very rough, but he did get better. Judging on the last 3-4 games he settled and did fine. But for some reason to many he's always been bad and never improved.... Carry on with that low IQ sheep mentality to fit in with other huddlers for lulz, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, MV%doe said:

Come on LG, you're smarter than to base your opinion off a couple bad plays. (I partly blame Shula for not helping him in the SB) You do also know remmers went to OTas, TC and the first few weeks of season as RT. Then one day he woke up and was the LT. Yes sir the start was very rough, but he did get better. Judging on the last 3-4 games he settled and did fine. But for some reason to many he's always been bad and never improved.... Carry on with that low IQ sheep mentality to fit in with other huddlers for lulz, I guess.

It's not a couple of plays. He's a serviceable backup and I'd like to keep him in that role, but he's not a starting caliber NFL OT. 

All the condescension and mockery in the world won't change that. It just makes you look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not a couple of plays. He's a serviceable backup and I'd like to keep him in that role, but he's not a starting caliber NFL OT. 

All the condescension and mockery in the world won't change that. It just makes you look bad.

I'll gladly look bad than only judge him off a few bad plays when he has plenty more good ones. Plus when I see improvements, I will not allow the huddle bash crew to think for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's starting caliber but on the very low tier end. The fact he can play more than one position at this point makes him a fantastic backup for this team but I agree, I prefer him not be our full time starter. That said, when healthy I actually think we have one of the better Olines in the league. Certainly in the top half. And that's with Remmers starting, so if we upgrade, watch out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remmers isn't great, but he was serviceable at RT, as the SB season is a testament to. He never had the talent to play LT on a consistent basis, everybody knew (knows) that, but unfortunately due to injuries and oversights that's the position he was put in. That's not his fault, and in my estimation it doesn't deserve being ragged on by Huddlers.

All that being said, I'd love to get a couple of OTs that push Remmers and Williams (who hasn't even played to Remmers' level) to the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...