Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who Should We Take With Our Top 3 Pick?


Mr. Miagi

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

He's shooting 37% from 3 in College and taking over 2 a game. 

 

Mkg barely took 1 a game and shot .25 percent in college. 

 

How are they the same? 

Sometimes guys just try throw something out there to see if it'll stick. Like how I throw my poo on the wall every now and then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

He's shooting 37% from 3 in College and taking over 2 a game. 

 

Mkg barely took 1 a game and shot .25 percent in college. 

 

How are they the same? 

over 2 a game???????? well color me impressed. maybe by the time he hits the hardest competition of his life he will be ready to maybe take .....3 a game. 

The guy isn't a good shooter, now he might become one. But I'd rather some other team take that risk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Miagi said:

Sometimes guys just try throw something out there to see if it'll stick. Like how I throw my poo on the wall every now and then. 

I'm not the only one who has made this comp btw. 

Quote

 But NBA teams can’t assume from his body of work that he can, which means teams will have three options as far as nurturing the talents he does have. It could try to live with his poor shooting at SF and make spacing the floor at the other four positions a priority, which is what Charlotte does with Kidd-Gilchrist.

 

 

btw fug me for having a different opinion than you and responding to your thread, amirite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...