Day 1&2 Summary

[Kakarot]

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Disagree rationally and we can talk rationally.

Whine, b--ch and panic like a spoiled five year old and I have no interest in your opinion.

Well, if that's the case, why don't you just ignore the post. Name calling isn't called for.

[Mr. Scot]

5 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

Well, if that's the case, why don't you just ignore the post. Name calling isn't called for.

Well, if you don't like name calling, you should probably avoid most of the OP's recent posts.  That's pretty much all there is.

[therealmjl]

List is growing rapidly

[Kakarot]

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, if you don't like name calling, you should probably avoid most of the OP's recent posts.  That's pretty much all there is.

Oh, I definitely think the name calling on both sides is wack.

[Ace_Aladdin]

25 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

Well, if that's the case, why don't you just ignore the post. Name calling isn't called for.

Dont talk to master like that 

[iamhubby1]

8 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Oh that must of been the same time it was a rule to blindly follow everything the FO does without having a opinion of your own...

Cool beans...

 

See, that's the problem right now. You and your ilk feel you are justified in calling out the FO for anything that upsets you. But if anyone, God forbid, has a positive word for the FO, they are labeled nuthuggers, and sheeple.

 

Yet you see no irony in the situation. You want your opinion to be validated. Yet you seem unwilling to do the same to those who oppose your opinion.

 

Oh, and you would be hard pressed to find even one person who feels that the FO has been perfect.