Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why I Have Fallen Out of Love with Fournette at 8...


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I figured I would post my thoughts on this and gauge the temp of the board on it.  During the combine, in most discussions I saw here, most people were worried about whether Fournette would even make it to #8.  While I admit, the prospect of infusing our backfield with a bruising, battering ram of a back to carry the load and ease some of the burden off of Cam is an immensely exciting scenario, I am now starting to question if this is the best move we can make.

Thinking more and more about VALUE over the last few days, and whether value lines up with where a specific player is being picked, as well as all the buzztalk about our offense looking to "evolve" going forward - it hit me...  If we are looking to evolve, to diversify our offense and add new wrinkles and layers to it, is Fournette at 8 the right move?  I'm starting to think the answer is no.

I go back to value...  when you think about a guy like McCaffrey, who fills multiple needs, who can play RB, WR, and return kicks, who is being projected in the late first to early second - THAT is unbeatable value.  That value is especially magnified when compared to a guy like Fournette who is the most one-dimensional back out of all the guys being projected in the first to early second round.

Fournette does one thing, and he does it really well.  And despite our history under Shula of having a "vertical" dimension to our offense, for the most part, we are a power run team.  And yes, Fournette fits that scheme perfectly...  IF, that is what we are continuing on as, but if we truly plan on evolving this season, then I think the best plan is to trade back, pick up more value/assets, and pick a guy like Ross and/or McCaffrey.  If we do so, I believe that will be the true indicator of whether or not the offense evolves this year, or plans to continue to do the same things it has...  and knowing Rivera's history, I suspect there won't be much in the way of evolution in philosophy or scheme this season.  It just sounds good to say following a 6-10 season and entering what many believe is a make or break year for the entire staff.

Regardless, whatever route we go, we are going to get a talent that will certainly provide some spark to an offense that stagnated last season, but which route is the most optimal - for now, for the future, for our organization, and for Cam?

A big, bruising back to handle the heavy lifting and carry the bulk of the workload that in turn likely opens up things in play action and the passing game?

Or a multi-dimensional talent that can line up at multiple spots on the field and create matchup nightmares for defenses (and when it comes to McCaffrey, someone who can also carry some of that workload in the run game)?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I respect you as a poster, but if I have to hear about McCaffrey being a better value back over Leonard Fournette again, I'm gonna go nuts (Jeremy wrote a shitty article today saying the same stupid s h i t).  Leonard Fournette is the best RB prospect in years.  If he falls to 8, we need to take him, if not him Adams.  That's the only two at that point.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I think he was referring to trading back, or taking McCaffrey later in the 1st.  Same regurgitated s h i t Jeremy stated earlier this morning.  

I can accept that, but my question is what if we don't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Would you want McCaffrey at #8?

Not at all.  In fact, I haven't been all that big of a fan of his, as far as how well his game will translate to the pros.

But, apparently scouts love him and according to McShay, thought his combine showing was even bwtter than expected.

I'm saying I think there is far greater value in trading back, picking up assets, and taking a guy like McCaffrey (or Ross, then taking a RB in the 2nd) later in the first while giving us another extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd for doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brandon_87 said:

Or how about reason a) we wouldn't utilize him properly and 8 is too high to take a RB in a read option offensE?

if Shula was gone I'd love him at 8, but not with the poo we run

If we're still running the read-option next year, I'm going to be really disappointed.

That part of the offense needs to "evolve" right on out the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off the Panthers aren't planning on trading back, the Ealy move proves that we are planning to move up. (both 2's for a 1st)

as far as Fournette versus other Running Backs, there is no one I'd rather have end of discussion.

as far as Fournette versus the rest lf the top 15 players, there are about 4-5 I wouldnt be mad at us picking up even tho I want Fournette, heck I've stated a few times on here that I'm not a fan at getting Adams at 8 because I think you can get quality play out of mid-tier FA SS's, but like I said when we drafted Kalil and Luke, any time you draft the best player at a position in the draft, it's a good pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Not at all.  In fact, I haven't been all that big of a fan of his, as far as how well his game will translate to the pros.

But, apparently scouts love him and according to McShay, thought his combine showing was even bwtter than expected.

I'm saying I think there is far greater value in trading back, picking up assets, and taking a guy like McCaffrey (or Ross, then taking a RB in the 2nd) later in the first while giving us another extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd for doing so.

One thing you have to factor in here: Gettleman doesn't like trading back. If he likes a player, he'll take him right where we are.

Thoughts on OJ Howard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we're still running the read-option next year, I'm going to be really disappointed.

That part of the offense needs to "evolve" right on out the door.

Supposedly 2 years ago we were done with it... but use it now more then ever lol "evolve " probably means bringing another TE to help block for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I respect you as a poster, but if I have to hear about McCaffrey being a better value back over Leonard Fournette again, I'm gonna go nuts (Jeremy wrote a shitty article today saying the same stupid s h i t).  Leonard Fournette is the best RB prospect in years.  If he falls to 8, we need to take him, if not him Adams.  That's the only two at that point.   

Lol, sorry brother...  I hadn't seen Jeremy's article yet.  It just occurred to me to post my thoughts on it as I had just saw McShay's latest mock and I had been thinking about whether we could justify taking a power back with the 8th pick in today's NFL.

Don't get me wrong, I would still be excited if we took Fournette, I just like the idea of trading back and getting more players to come in and raise our overall talent base and competition.  I just think taking Fournette would be a signal, that just like in the Superbowl, we view our offense as a hammer and every opponent is the same guage of nail - which I just don't think will win more than out-strategizing opponents going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...