Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the Panthers receive punishment for alternative facts?


Cookie Lyon

Recommended Posts

There is no guarantee that the injury occurred at the time of the MRI or not since he played after that. It could have happened later. Secondly, . A  small tear that doesn't require surgery would be reported  as no injury to avoid tipping off other teams that your quarterback is hurt for fear that opponents would target the injury to make it worse and they wouldn't fear his dep ball and crowd the box. Since the injury doesn't require surgery and it didn't stop,Cam from playing why would you report it. Do you think we report every turned ankle, turf toe injury unless it causes a player to be in doubt to play or miss a game. And small partial tears are treated non surgically and don't limit you unless the pain worsens signifying the tear is getting larger at which time you shut him down. You do,surgery if it worsens or doesn't respond to nonsurgical treatment options. That is why you are hearing about it now. They have tried the nonsurgical methods like medication, physical therapy etc and they haven't fixed the problem so they had to pursue surgery so he can recover in time for training camp. How long he is gone depends on what they actually find when they go in there. You conspiracy theorists are ridiculous. Every knew he was hurt. The extent is the only issue. They felt he could play which he did and that  it would be okay and heal Nonsurgically.now that it hasn't they go to plan B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no guarantee that the injury occurred at the time of the MRI or not since he played after that. It could have happened later. Secondly, . A  small tear that doesn't require surgery would be reported  as no injury to avoid tipping off other teams that your quarterback is hurt for fear that opponents would target the injury to make it worse and they wouldn't fear his dep ball and crowd the box. Since the injury doesn't require surgery and it didn't stop,Cam from playing why would you report it. Do you think we report every turned ankle, turf toe injury unless it causes a player to be in doubt to play or miss a game. And small partial tears are treated non surgically and don't limit you unless the pain worsens signifying the tear is getting larger at which time you shut him down. You do,surgery if it worsens or doesn't respond to nonsurgical treatment options. That is why you are hearing about it now. They have tried the nonsurgical methods like medication, physical therapy etc and they haven't fixed the problem so they had to pursue surgery so he can recover in time for training camp. How long he is gone depends on what they actually find when they go in there. You conspiracy theorists are ridiculous. Every knew he was hurt. The extent is the only issue. They felt he could play which he did and that  it would be okay and heal Nonsurgically.now that it hasn't they go to plan B.


I've had about enough of your level headed, well thought out viewpoints.. You'll never get pie with shenanigans like that.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

There is no guarantee that the injury occurred at the time of the MRI or not since he played after that. It could have happened later. Secondly, . A  small tear that doesn't require surgery would be reported  as no injury to avoid tipping off other teams that your quarterback is hurt for fear that opponents would target the injury to make it worse and they wouldn't fear his dep ball and crowd the box. Since the injury doesn't require surgery and it didn't stop,Cam from playing why would you report it. Do you think we report every turned ankle, turf toe injury unless it causes a player to be in doubt to play or miss a game. And small partial tears are treated non surgically and don't limit you unless the pain worsens signifying the tear is getting larger at which time you shut him down. You do,surgery if it worsens or doesn't respond to nonsurgical treatment options. That is why you are hearing about it now. They have tried the nonsurgical methods like medication, physical therapy etc and they haven't fixed the problem so they had to pursue surgery so he can recover in time for training camp. How long he is gone depends on what they actually find when they go in there. You conspiracy theorists are ridiculous. Every knew he was hurt. The extent is the only issue. They felt he could play which he did and that  it would be okay and heal Nonsurgically.now that it hasn't they go to plan B.

You make some valid points, but there is an issue here that can't be denied and could lead to locker room problems.

Let's assume Cam wanted to play, that's a fair assumption. It is also extremely likely that Luke wanted to play once he was cleared. Yet the staff chose to sit Luke in meaningless games but continue to trot Cam out there.

One of two things are true...either they value Luke's health and well being more than Cam's, or more likely, they let Cam make the call even though it was the staff's responsibilty to protect him from a bad decision.

In either scenario, different treatment for different employees is a quick way to lose the confidence of the workforce. As someone who managed many employees over the years I have seen this happen first hand, and more than once.

Spin it however you like, but I can pretty much guarantee that inside the locker room, players are talking about these very issues, and in no way is that a good thing for Rivera and company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Marguide said:

You make some valid points, but there is an issue here that can't be denied and could lead to locker room problems.

Let's assume Cam wanted to play, that's a fair assumption. It is also extremely likely that Luke wanted to play once he was cleared. Yet the staff chose to sit Luke in meaningless games but continue to trot Cam out there.

One of two things are true...either they value Luke's health and well being more than Cam's, or more likely, they let Cam make the call even though it was the staff's responsibilty to protect him from a bad decision.

In either scenario, different treatment for different employees is a quick way to lose the confidence of the workforce. As someone who managed many employees over the years I have seen this happen first hand, and more than once.

Spin it however you like, but I can pretty much guarantee that inside the locker room, players are talking about these very issues, and in no way is that a good thing for Rivera and company.

Great post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Marguide said:

You make some valid points, but there is an issue here that can't be denied and could lead to locker room problems.

Let's assume Cam wanted to play, that's a fair assumption. It is also extremely likely that Luke wanted to play once he was cleared. Yet the staff chose to sit Luke in meaningless games but continue to trot Cam out there.

One of two things are true...either they value Luke's health and well being more than Cam's, or more likely, they let Cam make the call even though it was the staff's responsibilty to protect him from a bad decision.

In either scenario, different treatment for different employees is a quick way to lose the confidence of the workforce. As someone who managed many employees over the years I have seen this happen first hand, and more than once.

Spin it however you like, but I can pretty much guarantee that inside the locker room, players are talking about these very issues, and in no way is that a good thing for Rivera and company.

Not the same at all. When Cam had a concussion he sat until he cleared the protocol. . Luke sat because he had multiply concussions and there is evidence that sitting out.longer is beneficial to prevent future problems. 

Cams shoulder issue was treated nonsurgically and there wasn't a clear protocol to follow. So everyone followed the established routine for a partial year. There is no evidence to show there was any favoritism shown. Truth is that Cam is a bigger investment than Luke so they would have been more careful with Cam given that football coaches and management aren't going to waste a 100 million investment when we already are going to have a losing season. Whether they liked Cam or not the investment risk would have guided their judgement 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Lobo said:

I hope it isn't a Cam is a "diva" thing where he doesn't take orders from a coach. There was something last month about Dorsey and Shula being cams "yes" men. Sort of like management won't do stuff to make cam mad. In all of cams career I've never got that impression. Cam seems like a team first kind of guy. I just hope none of this is true.

They certainly don't do enough to keep him happy either. I hope it's not true either. I've never gotten that impression. But it could be that they know he's saved their asses more times than not so let's not piss the franchise off. Idk, I don't think it's true. I just know Ron has no authority if he "tried" and couldn't get him to sit over an injured shoulder but pulled the big guns over a tie LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know if Canales is any good as a head coach yet, but he has done well with our non-XL receivers. I personally think he is handicapped by a key personnel and that is partly out of his hands for the next couple weeks. He's also very young, so will absolutely have head scratchers and growing pains. But outside of Wilks he's probably already out best HC since Rivera, which isn't saying much, and imo his ceiling is unknown vs Wilks' which is unfortunately very well known.
    • That's not what Bryce was pitched to be. Nor was the, what, 4th or 5th Tepper rebuild iteration? That's the problem with all this. You trade all this draft capital up to get these guys(Bryce, XL, etc) and then when they get their opportunities they can't hack it. As I have said many times, I view this as less of a development issue as I do an evaluation issue. We just suck at identifying talent correctly. It fails us all too often. If it was solely development, so many of these guys that left here after being failed draft picks would be studs. That is literally almost never the case.
    • I remember the days when it would take WRs a few years to figure it out in the NFL...  What a time that was! Getting to the point of guys finding success else where after flopping here:  patience and a vision. Thanks to Tepper, we haven't been able to develop a vision.  Without patience, everything is a reaction. That's not to say sometimes you can tell when a fit it bad and people need to move on.  In XLs case, it's not going to hurt us to be patient.   Sure, fans see how Tmac is doing and are like "XL who??"  I get it, but I also think reacting for the sake of reacting isn't the best thing to do. Should XL get off social media for a bit and focus on the game?  Yes.  As Cam screamed "Lock in bro!"   I know being patient is hard when you see guys get off to fast starts in their careers.  Tepper can't really afford to be reactive right now.  He's got to let Dan and Dave have the time to build their team. Most of us are Panther fans.  We're the idiots here, year after year, hoping things have changed.  Most of us will continue to do so, and hope things turn around.  While some of us will balk at the salary cap, contracts and wasted years; it doesn't affect us personally since we're just fan. Now for those folks on the teams...yeah...they need to get it together before they lose their jobs and have to move!
×
×
  • Create New...