Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DE or TE in first


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, mikeholiday said:

Conveniently forget last year when he picked three corners. Or a couple years back when he double dipped at DT. 

Last year, he put himself in a box, and he admitted as much in so many words. He basically said earlier this year that he would do no such thing with this year's draft. In other words, he fuged up, and there is no way he's doing that this year. Implicit in that is that he's getting back to his philosophy of BPA. He's said it several times this year that he believes in using free agency to set up the draft to that end. In his mind, I think that he has done that. 

His first year here was when he doubled down at the top of the draft with DTs. I'm fairly certain that I remember him saying that he had a first round grade on KK. Star and KK were the two best players available when we were on the clock. So that's really not a mystery, it's how it all fell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Last year, he put himself in a box, and he admitted as much in so many words. He basically said earlier this year that he would do no such thing. In other words, he fuged up, and there us no way he's doing that this year. Implicit in that is that he's getting back to his philosophy of BPA. He's said it several times thus year that he believes in using free agency to set up the draft to that end. In his mind, I think that he has done that. 

His first year here was when he doubled down at the top of the draft with DTs. I'm fairly certain that I remember him saying that he had a first round grade on KK. Star and KK were the two best players available when we were on the clock. So that's really not a mystery, it's how it all fell. 

 

I'm glad we at least got Peppers. We are so thin at DE. 

We need to pick up at least 2 this draft unless you want Wes Horton playing starter snaps next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikeholiday said:

I'm glad we at least got Peppers. We are so thin at DE. 

We need to pick up at least 2 this draft unless you want Wes Horton playing starter snaps next year. 

Well, I still believe that they believe Ryan Delaire is serviceable. When we add Kpassagnon, we'll be OK. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, I still believe that they believe Ryan Delaire is serviceable. When we add Kpassagnon, we'll be OK. 

We still need a twitchy pass rusher. If we switch to 4-3 under front, we can really use a guy like Charles Harris. His bend around the edge is unbelievable. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mikeholiday said:

We still need a twitchy pass rusher. If we switch to 4-3 under front, we can really use a guy like Charles Harris. His bend around the edge is unbelievable. 

 

Yes, from what I've researched about him, he has the potential to be one of the best rushers in this class. Some may disagree, but Harris might end up being the second best edge rusher in this class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Yes, from what I've researched about him, he has the potential to be one of the best rushers in this class. Some may disagree, but Harris might end up being the second best edge rusher in this class.

 

People kind of forget about him after his poor combine. But tape doesn't lie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, sanjay_rajput said:

There is no DE worth the 8th spot for the Panthers 4-3 scheme besides Garrett. 

Its either gonna be Fournette or OJ Howard.

McCaffrey > Barnnett if we move up in the bottom half of the 1st round. 

 

 

Constantly reading your mantra about Fournette and Howard is so tiresome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as sold on the early TE's as everyone else seems to be. I think there are a lot of play-making TE's who are ok or worse at blocking and it seems to me a blocking TE who has potential as a play-maker fits our needs better. As has been mentioned elsewhere this for me is George Kittle. However I think he is unlikely and even if not 1st Rnd they will select a TE on day one. I also worry that the 2nd TE will be misused by Shula, even if its Howard.                                                                                                                    As for DE's I think Barnett is off our radar because of his combine and pro-day which personally i see as a bit of a shame. I don't think he will fall as far as some believe but he obviously isn't nor has ever been a popular choice in many folks books. Thomas is a bit over-rated as a DE though he wouldn't be a terrible pick, and I'm even a bit skeptical about Garrett though it seems everyone has him as a nailed-on HOF-er before hes played an NFL snap. I actually think there is a bit of depth at DE in this draft and would be happy with  Basham, Tanoh, Willis or Walker. Even Hendricksen in the mid-rounds.                             So I guess i wouldn't be upset if we didn't take DE or TE in Rnd 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young? He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 
    • Initially, I wanted Stroud but I thought the trade up meant that, whoever they chose, it was for a reason.  There was no pressure to do anything for the entire scouting team to do other than investigate every aspect of the top 3 candidates.  Stroud had his question marks, and I think it is possible that he falters this year.  Bryce had a much worse situation here in Carolina because we neglected the OL, traded our #1 WR, did not pick WRs well in the draft, traded our pro bowl RB, and seem to disregard the TE position altogether.  Bozeman was not a good fit and we relied on an improved OL in 2022 to suggest that we were set there when we were far from it.  Fitterer had no vision, no grasp of talent, and everyone in the front office and on the coaching staff were pretending to be gurus.  Our coaching staff was a group of men earning a lifetime achievement paycheck.  It all goes back to the years of neglect for the OL.  My theory?  If Stroud had come to Carolina, he would be as mocked and ridiculed as Bryce Young.   No, he does not have a cannon.  Chad Pennington was a weak-armed QB who had success and would have been even better if it were not for injuries.  Smarts is important at QB, and so are mechanics.  Before you can address Young's mechanics, he needs an OL, Running game, and weapons. We were not really able to run play action from under center for a few reasons--play action is not effective when you have to pass the ball--other than that, the QB must turn his back to the LOS for about 1.5 seconds.  When the QB has less than 2.5 seconds to pass the ball, that eliminates that part of the play book.  Heck, even the run option is minimized when there is immediate facial pressure.  SO those who want to talk about happy feet, bouncing, etc--they are symptoms of the problem, not the problem.  A weak arm?  Well, Young's arm is between Chad Pennington and Joe Montana--closer to Joe.  His are is not as weak as some think--but he has issues with the deep ball. When you are reacting to the defense and quickly have to pass, then that takes away the strength because you don't have the base to get power behind it.  I still wish we had taken Stroud, but we have Young and if you toss him out before giving him support, you are not wise, unsmart, not unfoolish, and rather elite in your failure to attain mediocrity.  Expect growth.  How much? Nobody knows.
×
×
  • Create New...