Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets likely to trade or cut Decker per reports


Nails

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

So why not just say that in the first place?

I'd love to have this Julio Jones/Megatron borderline mythical uncoverable monster of a WR that Panthers fans dream of when they talk about a #1 WR, but there's just not many of them out there. Chances are we won't find one during Cam's career. Sad, but true.

And the Lions never amounted to squat with him. There really is not a recent precedent for all world receivers bringing championships home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csx said:

And the Lions never amounted to squat with him. There really is not a recent precedent for all world receivers bringing championships home.

Jerry Rice.  Not to say that I disagree with the point you and LinvilleGorge are making though, because I'm with you two.  Always amazes me how most huddlers think almost every receiver out there "sucks" or "is a decent #2 at best".  Well great!  We could use that in Carolina! haha

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

Jerry Rice.  Not to say that I disagree with the point you and LinvilleGorge are making though, because I'm with you two.  Always amazes me how most huddlers think almost every receiver out there "sucks" or "is a decent #2 at best".  Well great!  We could use that in Carolina! haha

 

That was the last name I could think of and that's not recent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csx said:

That was the lsst name I could think of and that's not recent. 

Agreed.

 

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

That and the definition of a #1 WR on this forum is basically a top 5 NFL WR and surefire future HOFer. That's a bit extreme. 

This ^^ is the point I'm w  you guys on.  You wouldn't see me getting amped and flippin' my $hit because we signed Decker if he's cut by the Jets, but I'm not gonna be upset about it either.  Especially if the money is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So why not just say that in the first place?

I'd love to have this Julio Jones/Megatron borderline mythical uncoverable monster of a WR that Panthers fans dream of when they talk about a #1 WR, but there's just not many of them out there. Chances are we won't find one during Cam's career. Sad, but true.

I never said I was looking for one.

As for me just saying that I didn't like Decker, any statement I make like that who is going to be based on how he fits with our team at the contract that he is most likely to receive.

Sorry that I don't spell that out in every post,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...