Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is It Meeks,Davidson Or Fox

KatsAzz

By KatsAzz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

Turnovers is just one part of it. I didnt feel like typing much those 2 times

You know thats interesting you said. They was all pretty much one dimensional in passing the ball. Judging the past weeks, teams was putting a lot of rushing yards and losing. Times are changing to being more of a passing league. But really, you have to do both effectively

Link to comment
Share on other sites
God Newbie

God

Posted
Posted

Turnovers is just one part of it. I didnt feel like typing much those 2 times

You know thats interesting you said. They was all pretty much one dimensional in passing the ball. Judging the past weeks, teams was putting a lot of rushing yards and losing. Times are changing to being more of a passing league. But really, you have to do both effectively

I agree, the league has really turned into a pass first thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

the offense and defense are put in a position to fail. That isn't new. Fox has a run game and elected not to lean on it since before the playoff game.....he has not been forced out of it. He lets other teams dictate what the Panthers do......that is NOT the sign of a running team. A running team sticks with b/c superior talent in that regards will eventually win out. The OL is good....their strength isn't in pass blocking. He plays the OL, the QB, and WRs to there weaknesses and NOT to there strengths. Jake throwing often and early, Moose running deep routes, OL in pass protection, defense playing soft (with little pass rush)......there is little coaching done in Carolina.

Nicely put.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted

Yea I posted right before the first game, we need to open up more

In 07, Davidson showed me what he can do. Now that our running game is better, its like he's limiting us to what we really can do. Just not creative at all. Same ol thing. Thats why we're struggling. But also, IMO its Jake. When you dont trust your QB, you do limit yourself. I've seen plenty of teams on a 3rd and 15 throw to get a 1st down. We just run instead

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GRWatcher Mentor

GRWatcher

Posted
Posted

It's on the players and their execution. They make the final call on the field no matter what the play is that is called in. They read the opponent's defense/offense and react to that. They need to make the changes that are needed based on what they read. They come to the decisions that will prove them successful or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fredlane34 Newbie

fredlane34

Posted
Posted

Yeah bro your smart. We only have Deangelo Williams, Jonathan Stewart, Steve Smith, and one of the best run blocking offensive lines, but can't get a first down in a quarter and a half and only put up 7 points. Definately not the playcalling.

my point,thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fireball77 Newbie

Fireball77

Posted
Posted

I think someone posted this in another thread but when your team is constantly starting on its own 15-20 yd line and is on the road and then on TOP of that, keeps shooting itself in the foot by putting themselves behind on the downs with penalties as you can clearly recall if you look at the drive charts, that is what has to be looked at even before playcalling, IMO. It's execution on ST and offense first.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2009092800/2009/REG3/panthers@cowboys/recap#tab:analyze/analyze-channels:cat-post-playbyplay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Okay gentlemen, REAL talk...

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Here's the thing. You compared him to Jake. Jake was signed to the practice squad out of college. Bryce was the number 1 overall. Their expectations are wildly different and so are their contracts. You can talk all you want about what a player is and where they are now and all this other mumbo jumbo, but Jake never had a 5th year option and we weren't talking about the possibility of a top 5 QB contract extension at the end of his 3rd year. What he was expected to be matters because we invested heavily at a cost of future capital, including a 2nd round pick this year, for him to be that guy. The cost to add Bryce took value from the team. To be worth it, he has to add that value back.  Actually, I don't prefer yards, TDs, or only INTs. All those stats by themselves are misleading which is why I said you have to use a lot of different stats. ADOT - Average depth of target.  Completion %. Pretty obvious until you factor in ADOT. 0-5 has a lot higher C% than 10-15%. Hang time. If a pass is in the air for 4.6 seconds vs 3.1 on a 40 yards throw, that gives a DB a lot of time to correct. Is it a loft or is it a laser.  EPA - Expected points added. A way of measuring QB efficiency on every play.  CPOE - ranking pass completions based on several factors, not just the throw.  There's obviously more, but those are the more common.  Typical stats don't show everything. You need to look all over. Looking at a stat line is lazy. That's why I said, you need to analyze everything. Once you start looking at the numbers you start looking at the player. That's why you follow numbers. They lead you places. You look at what happening when the numbers show you patterns. That's where you start finding the problems that yards, TDs and Ints won't show you.     
    • kungfoodude
      ESPN guys talk Bryce fifth year option

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      It's not relevant who wins or loses. It's about actually attempting to get better at the position.
    • Sup
      Bryce might be the most frustrating player we've ever had.

      By Sup · Posted

      Thank you. I don't understand how the Bryce stans don't see this. I've never seen a player get more hyped for doing so little. Honestly it's driving me a little insane.
×
×
  • Create New...