Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

lets say Andrew Luck decides to come out in 2011


Recommended Posts

Just now, Rags said:

I'm gonna go ahead and stop you right here because 1) the packers offense is tooled to get passes out a HELL of a lot quicker than ours and 2) The Packers had one of the best O-lines last year, rated 5th by PFF.

According to Ron, our offense has always been predicated on getting the ball out quick.  Just quoting the Coach here.  ;).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I'm retarded?  You're the one posting random ass sites, and spewing constant positive bull poo about a 6-10 team.  Just shut the f uck up, you clown and move the f uck on.  McCaffrey needs his dick wiped, he's waiting on you.  

I watch film and Cam's every snap, along with other QB analysts who have cataloged each and every snap.

All will attest to the fact personnel brought most of the problems for Cam.

fozzy.gif.beaf883de10d4bd71322591340b439c2.gif

And then you coming in and saying Cam and Luck are below average quarterbacks already eradicated any "sense" of validity in any of your arguments.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Make another thread about some bull s hit.  Come on, make another thread about McCaffrey being the second coming of Barry Sanders.  Come on boy.  Do it.  

Do it so he can have something else to cry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

I'm gonna go ahead and stop you right here because 1) the packers offense is tooled to get passes out a HELL of a lot quicker than ours and 2) The Packers had one of the best O-lines last year, rated 5th by PFF.

Well being honest, Rodgers is better than Cam, but not by much. He's on a whole different tier of his own, and his receivers were actually worse than Cam's in reliability.

But the o-line no question is far superior to what Cam had to go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

I watch film and Cam's every snap, along with other QB analysts who have cataloged each and every snap.

All will attest to the fact personnel brought most of the problems for Cam.

fozzy.gif.beaf883de10d4bd71322591340b439c2.gif

And then you coming in and saying Cam and Luck are below average quarterbacks already eradicated any "sense" of validity in any of your arguments.

 

I guess we'll just see, because he has the so called "weapons" now.  How about this, I'll make you a bet on here?  I'll talk positively about Cam, and admit I'm wrong over and over again, and say you're a great poster, and you're the best ever if Cam passes over 62 percent this season.  Since you're so confident it's his weapons.  If he passes below 62 percent, you can never make another shitty thread of yours.  Sound good?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Well being honest, Rodgers is better than Cam, but not by much. He's on a whole different tier of his own, and his receivers were actually worse than Cam's in reliability.

But the o-line no question is far superior to what Cam had to go through.

Oh yeah definitely Rodgers is a much better QB and out side of the receivers being unreliable, comparing their offenses is like comparing apples to oranges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

 you can never make another shitty thread of yours.  Sound good?  

You know you like. Don't have to use this website right. Or read his threads.

You could just go outside. Smoke a joint. Enjoy life.

Not get mad over a thread on a message board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...